Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Motto Motto Japanese Kitchen performance in the Australia and how they change over time
See what factors influence Motto Motto Japanese Kitchen performance in the Australia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Motto Motto Japanese Kitchen' competitors in the Australia
An analysis of Motto Motto Japanese Kitchen' competitors in the Australia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Motto Motto Japanese Kitchen is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market Performance reveals competitive strength and customer preference by indicating brand's share of foot traffic within the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Motto Motto Japanese Kitchen, with a market performance percentile of 99, is a leading brand. This indicates a strong market presence relative to peers like Falcha, Pho Hanoi 1979, HOPSCOTCH CAIRNS, Mitran Da Dhaba Blacktown, Saravanaa Bhavan, and Heartbreaker, who share a similar top-tier market standing.
CSAT reflects customer loyalty and overall experience, directly impacting brand reputation and repeat business in the competitive Cafe & Restaurants sector.
Motto Motto Japanese Kitchen's overall CSAT is 82%, a decrease of 4.9 percentage points year-over-year. Queensland shows a high CSAT of 87% with an increase of 3.1 percentage points, while New South Wales has a lower CSAT of 67% with a decrease of 21.9 percentage points. This suggests regional differences in customer experience.
Average Check is a key indicator of customer spending habits, reflecting menu pricing strategy and customer purchasing power within the Cafe & Restaurants market.
Motto Motto Japanese Kitchen's overall average check is 24.4 AUD, a decrease of 11.6% year-over-year. New South Wales has an average check of 25.7 AUD with 0% growth, while Queensland has an average check of 24 AUD, also with 0% growth. This indicates a decrease in spending compared to last year.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market penetration, reflecting expansion strategy and potential revenue streams in the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Motto Motto Japanese Kitchen has 10 outlets in Queensland and 4 in New South Wales. This shows a stronger presence in Queensland compared to New South Wales, indicating potential for further expansion in the latter region.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer cross-visitation patterns, informing competitive positioning and marketing strategies in the Cafe & Restaurants market.
Motto Motto Japanese Kitchen's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (6.25%), Guzman y Gomez (4.17%), Starbucks (3.47%), The Coffee Club (2.78%), and IMC Steak House (2.78%). This indicates that customers who visit Motto Motto also frequent these establishments.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation, ensuring efficient service during peak hours and maximizing revenue potential.
Motto Motto Japanese Kitchen experiences peak traffic between 10:00 AM and 7:00 PM, with the highest workload at 6:00 PM (57.37). Traffic is minimal during early morning and late-night hours, suggesting operational focus during daytime and early evening.
Understanding consumer segments allows for targeted marketing and product development, maximizing engagement and driving sales growth.
Women (114) are overrepresented among Motto Motto Japanese Kitchen's customers, while men (89) are underrepresented. Gen Y (123) is overrepresented, while Gen X (47) and Gen Z (61) are underrepresented. This suggests a high affinity with female and Gen Y consumers.