Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Miyama performance in the Japan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Miyama performance in the Japan and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Miyama' competitors in the Japan
An analysis of Miyama' competitors in the Japan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Miyama is in the lower 28% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Miyama's market performance is at the 28th percentile, indicating a below average market standing. This means Miyama captures less foot traffic compared to most competitors in Japan's Cafe & Restaurants industry. Performance peers in the same percentile include Hickory, Naitai Terrace, Hashimoto Horumon, 錦糸町ガールズバー BAR CHEERS（バーチアーズ）, Yama, and すし酒場 にほんいち 本町店.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty, directly impacting revenue and long-term sustainability.
Miyama's overall customer satisfaction is 60%, a 1.2 percentage point increase year-over-year. Okayama Prefecture shows the highest satisfaction at 89%, while Osaka Prefecture has the lowest at 24% with a significant decrease. This suggests regional disparities in customer experience that need attention.
Outlet distribution indicates market reach and expansion potential, influencing brand accessibility and growth.
Miyama has multiple outlets across Japan, with Okayama and Fukuoka Prefectures leading with 3 outlets each. Okinawa, Kanagawa, Osaka and Tokushima Prefectures each have 2 outlets. Ibaraki, Aichi, Oita and Iwate Prefectures each have 1 outlet. This distribution provides a foundation for regional marketing strategies.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences, informing competitive strategies and differentiation efforts.
Miyama's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's, Kura Sushi, Starbucks, 店, and Gyoza no Ohsho. A 10% cross-visitation rate indicates that Miyama's customers also frequent these establishments. This overlap suggests opportunities for Miyama to differentiate its offerings and attract more loyal customers.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation, enhancing operational efficiency and customer experience.
Miyama experiences peak traffic workload between 11 AM and 8 PM, with the highest workload around 1 PM. Traffic is minimal during early morning hours. This data helps optimize staffing and resource allocation to meet customer demand effectively during peak hours.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, improving engagement and ROI.
Miyama's customer base shows high affinity towards women (94) and men (104). Gen Z is significantly overrepresented (356), while Gen Y is underrepresented (48). Gen X is near average (99). This suggests a strong appeal to younger consumers, particularly Gen Z, while Gen Y engagement is lower.