Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Kale Me Crazy performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Kale Me Crazy performance in the United States and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Kale Me Crazy is in the lower 28% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
An analysis of Kale Me Crazy' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Kale Me Crazy' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile indicates brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
Kale Me Crazy's market performance is in the lower 28%, indicating a lagging position. This means the brand captures less foot traffic than most competitors. Performance peers in similar range: King's Hawaiian, Flama Llama, Meating Street, The Post, DarSalam, Brooklyn Pizzeria.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer happiness, impacting loyalty, brand reputation, and revenue growth.
Kale Me Crazy's overall CSAT is 80%, a 2.7pp increase year-over-year, indicating improved customer happiness. Georgia shows higher CSAT (81%) with a 4.9pp increase, while Alabama's CSAT is 80% with a 3.3pp decrease. CSAT peaked in August 2025 at 83.67%.
Average check reveals spending habits, influencing revenue strategies and profitability analysis.
Kale Me Crazy's overall average check is $19.10, a 19.1% decrease year-over-year, suggesting lower customer spending. Georgia's average check is $18.70 with no growth. The average check remained relatively stable from June to August 2025.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion, influencing market presence and revenue potential.
Kale Me Crazy has 22 outlets. Georgia has 18 outlets, dominating the brand's presence. North Carolina has 2, while Florida and Alabama each have 1 outlet, indicating limited presence in those states.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals, informing competitive strategies and market positioning.
Kale Me Crazy's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (10.71%), Chick-fil-A (7.14%), and Mellow Mushroom (5.36%). Rreal Tacos and Smoke and Friends each have 3.57% cross-visitation.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation based on peak hours.
Kale Me Crazy's peak traffic workload occurs between 12 PM and 2 PM, reaching 55.53% at 1 PM. Traffic starts increasing at 7 AM, peaks during lunch hours, and declines after 6 PM. There is no traffic between 8 PM and 6 AM.
Consumer segment analysis informs targeted marketing by understanding audience demographics and preferences.
Women show a high affinity (112 Index) towards Kale Me Crazy, while men are under-indexed (89 Index). Gen Y shows a very high affinity (134 Index), while Gen X (68 Index) and Gen Z (89 Index) are under-indexed.