Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Hama Sushi performance in the Japan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Hama Sushi performance in the Japan and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Hama Sushi' competitors in the Japan
An analysis of Hama Sushi' competitors in the Japan
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Hama Sushi is in the top 18% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals brand's share of foot traffic, indicating competitive strength and customer preference.
Hama Sushi's market performance is at the 82nd percentile, placing it in the average/above average range. This indicates a solid market standing relative to competitors like Kura Sushi, Sushiro, Saizeriya and Gyu-Kaku, which are in the same percentile range.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer happiness, influencing loyalty and brand reputation, which impacts long-term success.
Hama Sushi's overall CSAT is 65%, a 3.4 percentage point increase year-over-year. Okinawa Prefecture shows the highest CSAT at 80%, while Nagano and Tottori Prefectures experienced a decrease. The CSAT dynamic data shows fluctuations between 63.69% and 65.30%.
Average check (transaction value) indicates spending per customer, crucial for revenue insights and profitability assessment.
Hama Sushi's overall average check is 1.8K JPY, a 5.4% increase year-over-year. Akita and Shimane Prefectures lead with 2.3K JPY. The average check dynamic data fluctuates between 1722.45 JPY and 1885.99 JPY.
Outlet count reflects brand reach and market presence, indicating expansion and accessibility to customers.
Hama Sushi has the highest number of outlets in Saitama and Kanagawa Prefectures, with 41 outlets each. Aichi Prefecture follows closely with 40 outlets. Miyagi Prefecture has the fewest outlets among the top regions, with 15.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer overlap, informing competitive strategies and market positioning.
Hama Sushi's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (14.03%), 店 (9.04%), Sukiya (7.86%), 店 (7.10%), and Sushiro (6.06%). This indicates a significant overlap in customer base with these brands.
Traffic workload analysis reveals peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation for optimal service.
Hama Sushi experiences peak traffic workload between 11:00 AM and 8:00 PM, with the highest workload at 73.42% at 7:00 PM. Traffic is minimal between midnight and 9:00 AM.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, tailoring strategies to specific demographics for increased engagement.
Hama Sushi's consumer base is predominantly women (85% affinity). Gen X shows the highest affinity (117%), while Gen Y (86%) and Gen Z (87%) are under-indexed. This suggests targeted marketing towards women and Gen X could be effective.