Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Ginza Lion performance in the Japan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Ginza Lion performance in the Japan and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Ginza Lion is right in the middle
Sample of brands in the same percentile
An analysis of Ginza Lion' competitors in the Japan
An analysis of Ginza Lion' competitors in the Japan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Ginza Lion's market performance is at the 48th percentile, indicating a below average/lagging market position. This means the brand captures less foot traffic than most competitors. Performance peers in the same percentile range include Eel Hitsumabushi Sumiyagura and Ichibanken.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception and loyalty, directly impacting revenue and long-term growth.
Ginza Lion's overall CSAT is 78%, a decrease of 2.5 percentage points year-over-year. Kyoto and Chiba Prefectures show high CSAT (85%), while Kanagawa Prefecture has a lower CSAT (63%) with a significant decrease. This suggests regional differences in customer experience.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, crucial for revenue forecasting and menu optimization.
Ginza Lion's overall average check is 3.7K JPY, up 5.3% year-over-year. Kanagawa Prefecture has the highest average check (3.9K JPY). This indicates increased spending per customer, potentially due to menu changes or pricing adjustments.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market penetration, influencing brand visibility and accessibility.
Ginza Lion has a varying number of outlets across different prefectures. Chiba, Saitama and Kanagawa Prefectures each have 3 outlets. This distribution reflects the brand's strategic presence across Japan.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences, informing competitive strategies and market positioning.
Ginza Lion's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (7.94%), Starbucks (7.94%), 店 (6.95%), 店 (5.71%), and Sukiya (4.96%). This indicates that customers who visit Ginza Lion also frequent these establishments.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation, enhancing operational efficiency and customer experience.
Ginza Lion experiences peak traffic workload between 11:00 and 21:00, with the highest workload around 19:00 (55.21). There is minimal traffic workload between 0:00 and 5:00. This data informs staffing and resource allocation strategies.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, improving engagement and ROI.
Ginza Lion's customer base shows a higher affinity towards women (index 78) and men (index 116). Gen X (index 137) shows high affinity, while Gen Z (index 22) is under-indexed. This suggests targeted marketing towards Gen X and understanding Gen Z preferences.