Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Everytable performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Everytable performance in the United States and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Everytable' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Everytable' competitors in the United States
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Everytable is in the lower 32% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
Everytable's market performance is in the lower 32%, indicating a lagging position. This means Everytable captures less foot traffic compared to most competitors. Performance peers in a similar range include LongBoard Bar and Grill, Category 10, Ampersea, Ramen Nagi, By Golly's, and Casa Chapala.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer happiness, impacting loyalty, brand reputation, and revenue growth.
Everytable's overall CSAT is 90%, a 1.8 percentage point increase year-over-year. In California, CSAT is also 90% with a 1.8 percentage point increase. This indicates high customer satisfaction and positive trend.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, crucial for revenue and profitability analysis.
Everytable's overall average check is $16.50, a 44.5% increase year-over-year. In California, the average check is $16.50. This shows a significant rise in customer spending per transaction.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence, influencing accessibility and brand awareness.
Everytable has 41 outlets in California. This indicates a focused presence within the state, suggesting a regional market strategy.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals, informing strategies for differentiation and market share growth.
Everytable's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are Starbucks (11.32%), Jack in the Box (7.55%), In-N-Out Burger (7.55%), Wendy's (3.77%), and Spires Restaurant (3.77%). This highlights the brands that Everytable customers also frequent.
Traffic workload reveals peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation for optimal service.
Everytable experiences peak traffic between 10 AM and 6 PM, with the highest workload around 12 PM (50.55%). Traffic is minimal during early morning and late-night hours.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, improving engagement and ROI by tailoring messaging.
Everytable's customer base shows a higher affinity among women (107 index) compared to men (93 index). Gen Y (118 index) shows high affinity, while Gen Z (74 index) and Gen X (91 index) are under-indexed.