Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Dhaba Estd 1986 Delhi performance in the India and how they change over time
See what factors influence Dhaba Estd 1986 Delhi performance in the India and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Dhaba Estd 1986 Delhi' competitors in the India
An analysis of Dhaba Estd 1986 Delhi' competitors in the India
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Dhaba Estd 1986 Delhi is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals brand's share of foot traffic, reflecting its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Dhaba Estd 1986 Delhi's market performance percentile is 99, indicating a leading position within the Cafe & Restaurants industry in India. This suggests high customer preference and competitive strength. Performance peers in a similar position include Makkhan's Veg Restaurant, Café School, Arunima Chinese House, Farmhouse, SERAI FAMILY SKYDINE (MIRA ROAD), and SHEBA MANDHI.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) is a key indicator of customer loyalty and brand perception, directly impacting business growth and reputation.
Dhaba Estd 1986 Delhi has an overall CSAT of 74%, a 6.5pp increase year-over-year. CSAT varies by state, with Delhi showing the highest CSAT (78%) and growth (21.7pp). Telangana and Karnataka show decreased CSAT. This suggests the need to focus on improving customer experience in specific regions.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, indicating pricing strategy effectiveness and customer willingness to spend.
Dhaba Estd 1986 Delhi's overall average check is 1.3K INR, a 0.6% increase year-over-year. Delhi has the highest average check (1.5K INR). All the growth values in states are 0, meaning they are the same as previous year.
Number of outlets reflects brand's reach and expansion strategy, indicating market presence and growth potential.
Dhaba Estd 1986 Delhi has the most outlets in Delhi (8), followed by Haryana (5). Uttar Pradesh and Karnataka each have 2 outlets, while Maharashtra, Telangana, Assam, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Tamil Nadu have 1 each. This shows a strong presence in Northern India with expansion in other regions.
Identifying top competitors based on customer cross-visitation helps refine marketing strategies and understand competitive landscape.
McDonald's (6.45%) is the top competitor for Dhaba Estd 1986 Delhi based on cross-visitation, followed by Domino's Pizza (3.94%), Social (3.23%), Adyar Ananda Bhavan - A2B (2.87%), and Bikanervala (2.87%). This indicates that customers of Dhaba Estd 1986 Delhi also frequent fast-food chains and casual dining restaurants.
Traffic workload distribution by hour helps optimize staffing and resource allocation to match peak demand periods.
Traffic workload for Dhaba Estd 1986 Delhi peaks between 12:00 PM and 10:00 PM, with the highest workload observed around 8:00 PM (55.38%). There is minimal activity between midnight and 11:00 AM. This highlights the restaurant's reliance on lunch and dinner service.
Understanding consumer segments by gender and generation enables targeted marketing, enhancing engagement and relevance.
Dhaba Estd 1986 Delhi shows a higher affinity with women (107%) and Gen Z (132%). Gen X also exhibits a high affinity (118%). Gen Y is under-indexed (94%). This suggests marketing should focus on attracting Gen Z women and Gen X, while also engaging Gen Y.