Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
See what factors influence Crema Gourmet Espresso Bar performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Crema Gourmet Espresso Bar performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Crema Gourmet Espresso Bar' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Crema Gourmet Espresso Bar' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Crema Gourmet Espresso Bar is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Crema Gourmet Espresso Bar holds a leading position in the Cafe & Restaurants industry in the United States with a market performance of 99%. This high percentile indicates a strong market presence. Performance peers: Collins Quarter, Wicked Tuna, Avocado Theory, Bag O'Crab, Million's Crab, Cousins Subs.
CSAT measures customer happiness. Monitoring CSAT helps improve service, retain customers, and boost brand loyalty for sustained growth.
Crema Gourmet Espresso Bar's overall customer satisfaction is 78%, a decrease of 3.4 percentage points year-over-year. CSAT in Florida is 78% (down 3pp) and in New York is 78% (down 7.6pp). This indicates a need to identify and address factors impacting customer satisfaction in both states to improve overall brand perception.
Average check (or ticket size) shows how much customers spend per visit, which drives revenue and reveals pricing power and customer value.
The overall average check for Crema Gourmet Espresso Bar is $24.7, reflecting a 9% increase year-over-year. The average check in Florida is $24.8 USD, while in New York it is $23.3 USD. The increased average check suggests effective upsell strategies or increased menu prices.
Outlet count indicates brand reach. More outlets often mean greater market coverage and higher revenue potential in key geographic areas.
Crema Gourmet Espresso Bar has a total of 17 outlets. Florida has 16 outlets, while New York has 1 outlet. This distribution indicates a strong presence in Florida, with a smaller footprint established in New York, suggesting possible expansion opportunities.
Competitor analysis spots market rivals. Knowing who customers also visit reveals direct competition and ways to stand out and grow market share.
The top competitors for Crema Gourmet Espresso Bar, based on customer cross-visitation, are Stafili Wine Cafe (5.80%), Starbucks (5.46%), McDonald's (3.75%), Chick-fil-A (3.07%), and The Cheesecake Factory (3.07%). This data identifies key competitors to monitor and benchmark against for strategic advantages.
Traffic workload shows peak hours. Knowing when customers visit helps optimize staffing, manage inventory, and improve service during busiest times.
Traffic at Crema Gourmet Espresso Bar peaks between 8 AM and 12 PM, with the highest traffic workload occurring between 9 AM and 11 AM. Minimal traffic occurs between 9 PM and 6 AM. Adjusting staffing levels and promotions to align with peak hours will maximize efficiency.
Consumer segments identify key groups. Understanding their traits helps tailor marketing, innovate products, and boost engagement and loyalty.
Among Crema Gourmet Espresso Bar consumers, women are slightly under-indexed (98) and men are over-indexed (102). Gen Y is significantly over-indexed (124), while Gen X (91) and Gen Z (85) are under-indexed. This suggests a high affinity among Gen Y consumers and an opportunity to engage Gen X and Gen Z through targeted campaigns.