Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Bruno Foodcorner performance in the Belgium and how they change over time
See what factors influence Bruno Foodcorner performance in the Belgium and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Bruno Foodcorner' competitors in the Belgium
An analysis of Bruno Foodcorner' competitors in the Belgium
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Bruno Foodcorner is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand's foot traffic share, showing competitive strength and customer preference in the cafe & restaurant industry.
Bruno Foodcorner holds a leading market performance position with a percentile of 99, indicating it's in the top 1% of brands. This high percentile reflects strong customer preference and a significant market share compared to competitors like Lunch Garden, PIZZA DA MIMMO, Royal Indian Taste, Le Barbecue de Jacky, Le coin de l'Ecailler, and Mister Spaghetti which are in the same percentile range.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) measures how happy customers are, influencing loyalty and repeat business, key for sustainable growth.
Bruno Foodcorner's overall customer satisfaction is 71%, a 3.8 percentage point increase year-over-year. In Flanders, the CSAT is 69%, with a growth of 2.5 percentage points. The CSAT dynamic data shows fluctuations over the months, peaking at 78% in June 2025, indicating positive customer sentiment during the analysed period.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, impacting revenue. Tracking changes helps optimize pricing and promotions for profitability.
The overall average check for Bruno Foodcorner is 20.3 EUR, a significant 30.6% increase year-over-year. In Flanders, the average check is also 20.3 EUR. The dynamic data shows the average check varying over the months, indicating potential impact of promotions or seasonal changes.
Outlet count reflects brand reach. Monitoring it indicates expansion strategy effectiveness and market penetration within the industry.
Bruno Foodcorner has 17 outlets in Flanders. This indicates a focused presence in this region. A stable number suggests a steady state in outlet operations during the specified period.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals, informing strategies to gain market share and differentiate the brand's offerings effectively.
The top competitors for Bruno Foodcorner, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (14.29%), Quick (5.14%), Burger King (2.86%), Lunch Garden (2.86%) and Stadscafé ('t) (2.29%). McDonald's has a substantial lead in cross-visitation, while the other brands have significantly lower rates.
Traffic workload identifies peak hours. Understanding customer flow enables efficient staffing and resource allocation for optimal service.
Traffic workload for Bruno Foodcorner varies throughout the day, peaking between 12:00 and 19:00, with the highest workload at 12:00 (61.98%). The lowest traffic workload is in the early morning hours, indicating a typical business cycle for a cafe/restaurant.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, tailoring products and messages to resonate with specific demographics for maximum impact.
Bruno Foodcorner's customer base shows high affinity towards women (68% value label, affinity index 68) and Gen X (135% value label, affinity index 135). Gen Y (89% value label, affinity index 89) and Gen Z (67% value label, affinity index 67) are under-indexed, indicating lower engagement compared to the average consumer.