Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Zao Asian Cafe is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Zao Asian Cafe performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Zao Asian Cafe performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Zao Asian Cafe' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Zao Asian Cafe' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Zao Asian Cafe's market performance is leading with a percentile of 99. This indicates a strong market position. Performance peers include Sharif's Famous, Lemon Indian Cuisine, Honest Indian Vegetarian Restaurant, Zollo's Pizza, The Rooster’s Den, and Drago's Seafood Restaurant, all with the same position.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty, directly influencing revenue and long-term success. It highlights areas for improvement.
The overall customer satisfaction for Zao Asian Cafe is 84%, a decrease of 2.9 percentage points year-over-year. Utah shows high satisfaction (89%) with a growth of 2.6pp. Colorado shows lower satisfaction (75%) with a decline of 12.6pp. This indicates regional variations in customer experiences.
Average check reveals customer spending habits and pricing effectiveness, impacting overall revenue and profitability of the brand.
The overall average check for Zao Asian Cafe is $16.10, an increase of 10.1% year-over-year. In Utah, the average check is $16.20 USD, while in Colorado, it's $15.60 USD. This suggests a consistent average spend across different states.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence, influencing customer accessibility and potential revenue streams. This KPI shows company expansion.
Zao Asian Cafe has 20 outlets in Utah and 1 outlet in Colorado. This shows a strong presence in Utah, but a limited footprint in Colorado.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and their market share, informing competitive strategies and differentiation efforts. Knowing your enemy is crucial.
The top competitors for Zao Asian Cafe are McDonald's (8.90%), In-N-Out Burger (8.22%), Mo'Bettahs Hawaiian Style Food (6.85%), Chick-fil-A (6.85%), and Costa Vida (6.16%). This indicates a significant overlap in customer base with fast-food and other casual dining restaurants.
Traffic workload distribution reveals peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation for optimized service and revenue.
Zao Asian Cafe experiences peak traffic workload between 11:00 AM and 7:00 PM, with the highest workload at 12:00 PM (62.87%) and 1:00 PM (62.12%). Traffic is minimal before 10:00 AM and after 9:00 PM. Staffing should be maximized during peak hours.
Analyzing consumer segments informs targeted marketing, optimizing strategies for specific demographics by understanding their behavior and preferences.
For Zao Asian Cafe, women are slightly under-indexed (98) and men are slightly over-indexed (102). Gen X is under-indexed (93), while Gen Y (107) and Gen Z (126) are over-indexed. This suggests a stronger affinity among younger generations.