Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
添好運 is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence 添好運 performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
See what factors influence 添好運 performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of 添好運' competitors in the Taiwan
An analysis of 添好運' competitors in the Taiwan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing competitive strength and customer preference.
添好運's market performance is at the 99th percentile, indicating a leading position. This places it in the top 1% of brands, suggesting strong market presence and customer preference. Performance peers within the same range include 大漁迴轉壽司, 鳳城燒臘快餐, Market Flavor悅·市集, Newhouse歐風新食館(富國店), 嗑肉石鍋台中大里德芳店, Day2night熱狗堡(逢甲店).
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty, directly impacting retention and revenue.
Overall customer satisfaction for 添好運 is 69%, an increase of 11.1 percentage points year-over-year. Zhubei City shows the highest satisfaction at 93%, with a growth of 43.1 percentage points. Customer satisfaction in other cities includes Taoyuan City (79%), Tainan (75%), Taipei (69%), and New Taipei (64%), all showing positive growth. The CSAT trend was decreasing during the measured period.
Average check indicates customer spending per visit, crucial for revenue optimization and profitability assessment.
The overall average check for 添好運 is 616.5 TWD, a 6.2% increase year-over-year. Kaohsiung has the highest average check at 706.7 TWD. Other cities include Taichung (668.2 TWD), Taipei (617 TWD), Taoyuan City (603.2 TWD), and New Taipei (584.2 TWD). The average check trend was decreasing during the measured period.
Outlet count reflects brand reach and expansion strategy, influencing market coverage and accessibility.
添好運 has a total of 13 outlets across Taiwan. Taipei has the most outlets with 4, followed by Taichung with 3. New Taipei has 2 outlets, while Tainan, Taoyuan City, Zhubei City and Kaohsiung each have 1 outlet.
Identifying top competitors highlights market rivalry and customer choice, enabling strategic positioning and differentiation.
The top competitors for 添好運, based on cross-visitation, are Starbucks (8.60%), McDonald's (7.17%), Din Tai Fung (3.94%), MOS Burger (3.58%), and 店 (2.87%). This indicates that customers who visit 添好運 also frequently visit these brands.
Traffic workload by hours reveals peak operational periods, optimizing staffing and resource allocation for efficiency.
Traffic workload for 添好運 peaks between 11:00 AM and 8:00 PM, with the highest workload observed between 12:00 PM and 6:00 PM. Minimal activity is recorded during the night and early morning hours (10:00 PM - 9:00 AM).
Analyzing consumer segments informs targeted marketing, enhancing engagement and brand resonance within specific demographics.
Women are over-represented (93 index), while Men are over-represented (107 index). Gen X is over-represented (174 index), Gen Y is slightly over-represented (102 index), and Gen Z is under-represented (65 index). The index values indicate relative affinity and do not represent percentages of users.