Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Storming Crab is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Storming Crab performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Storming Crab performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Storming Crab' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Storming Crab' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
MARKET PERFORMANCE percentile reveals brand's competitive strength and customer preference in the industry. It highlights brand's share of foot traffic.
Storming Crab's MARKET PERFORMANCE is at the 99th percentile, indicating a leading position in the Cafe & Restaurants industry in the United States. This shows strong customer preference. Performance peers in similar range include: Taqueria Taco Express, Gold Star, Noche de margaritas, Noches De Colombia Clifton, Nobu, and 100 Fun.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) measures how well the brand meets customer expectations. Declining CSAT can indicate problems that need to be addressed.
Overall customer satisfaction for Storming Crab is 65%, a decrease of 10.1 percentage points year-over-year. CSAT varies by state: New Mexico and Pennsylvania lead at 89%, while Indiana lags. The recent trend shows CSAT fluctuating between 61.86% and 70.40% from April to June 2025.
Average check is the typical amount customers spend. Tracking this metric reveals pricing perceptions and revenue trends over the time.
The overall average check for Storming Crab is $54.60, down 1.8% year-over-year. Illinois has the highest average check at $68.90. The average check fluctuated between $52.98 and $55.97 from April to June 2025.
Outlet count indicates brand's market penetration and growth. More outlets generally mean greater customer access and market share.
Storming Crab has the most outlets in Tennessee (3), followed by Pennsylvania, Missouri, Indiana, and Kentucky (2 each). New Mexico, Illinois, Florida, South Dakota, and New York each have 1 outlet.
Understanding key competitors helps in strategic positioning. It shows which brands attract similar customers, revealing direct competition.
The top competitors for Storming Crab, based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (9.70%), Taco Bell (7.55%), Texas Roadhouse (5.93%), Olive Garden Italian Restaurant (4.85%), and Wendy's (4.58%). These brands attract a similar customer base.
Traffic workload analysis helps optimize staffing and resource allocation. It shows when stores are busiest, enabling better service.
Storming Crab experiences peak traffic between 17:00 (5 PM) and 19:00 (7 PM), with the highest workload around 18:00 (6 PM) at 52.50. Traffic is minimal between midnight and 10:00 AM.
Analyzing consumer segments enables targeted marketing. Understanding who your customers are informs messaging and product development.
Storming Crab's customer base is slightly more female (Index 105) than male (Index 95). There is high affinity for Gen X (Index 123), indicating they are overrepresented. Conversely, Gen Y (Index 89) and Gen Z (Index 76) show lower affinity relative to the average.