Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Sate is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Sate performance in the Indonesia and how they change over time
See what factors influence Sate performance in the Indonesia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Sate' competitors in the Indonesia
An analysis of Sate' competitors in the Indonesia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
Sate, with a market performance of 99, is a leading brand in Indonesia's Cafe & Restaurants industry. This high percentile means Sate captures a significant portion of customer traffic compared to its peers. Performance peers like Haus, Mie Gacoan Jakarta - Sunter, Mie Gacoan - Ngagel, Mie Gacoan Jakarta - Radin Inten, Ayam Crisbar Kelapa Dua Depok, and Kampung Kecil Rajawali are in a similar leading position.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) indicates brand perception, influencing loyalty and repeat business. Monitoring CSAT growth highlights improvements.
Sate boasts an 88% overall CSAT, up 9.6pp year-over-year, showing improved customer happiness. The Lesser Sunda Islands region leads with 92% CSAT, a 30pp increase. Java shows 87% CSAT, up 7.4pp, indicating strong regional performance.
Average check (AvgCheck) reflects spending per customer, vital for revenue insights and pricing strategy assessment.
Sate's overall average check is 142K IDR, up 12.6% year-over-year, suggesting customers are spending more. Lesser Sunda Islands has an average check of 173.9K IDR. Java's average check is 135K IDR. The provided data indicates that the average check has a decreasing trend.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and market presence, crucial for expansion strategy and market share dominance.
Sate has 60 outlets in Java and 4 in Lesser Sunda Islands. Java accounts for most of Sate's presence. The brand has a significantly larger footprint in Java compared to the Lesser Sunda Islands.
Identifying competitors via cross-visitation helps understand customer preferences and competitive landscape, informing strategic positioning.
Sate's top competitors, based on customer cross-visitation, are Starbucks (5.96%), Pizza Hut (5.00%), Solaria (3.85%), KFC (3.08%), and Kopi Kenangan (3.08%). These brands attract some of Sate's customers, revealing direct competition.
Traffic workload by hour shows peak times, enabling optimized staffing, resource allocation, and marketing campaign scheduling.
Sate's peak traffic hours are between 10:00 and 21:00, with the highest workload occurring around 17:00-19:00. Activity is minimal in the early morning (0:00-7:00). This indicates when Sate is busiest, which could be used to allocate staff.
Understanding consumer segments by gender and generation allows for targeted marketing and tailored brand messaging.
Sate's customer base shows a high affinity for women (92 Index) and men (106 Index). Gen X is strongly overrepresented (145 Index), while Gen Y (96 Index) and Gen Z (84 Index) are less represented relative to the average consumer.