Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Haus is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Haus performance in the Indonesia and how they change over time
See what factors influence Haus performance in the Indonesia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Haus' competitors in the Indonesia
An analysis of Haus' competitors in the Indonesia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand's share of foot traffic, showing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Haus, with a market performance percentile of 99 in Indonesia's Cafe & Restaurants industry, is a leading brand. This means Haus captures a significantly higher share of customer traffic compared to most competitors. Performance peers, such as Sate, Mie Gacoan - Ngagel, Mie Gacoan Jakarta - Sunter, Ayam Crisbar Kelapa Dua Depok, Mie Gacoan Denai and Mie Gacoan Jakarta - Radin Inten, share this leading position, indicating a competitive landscape at the top.
Customer satisfaction is crucial for brand loyalty and growth, reflecting how well a brand meets customer expectations and fostering positive word-of-mouth.
Haus boasts a 90% customer satisfaction in Indonesia, a significant 21.3 percentage point increase year-over-year. This high CSAT indicates customers are highly satisfied with Haus. Java region shows a 90% satisfaction rate as well with a growth value of 21.3 percentage points up.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, crucial for revenue analysis and pricing strategy optimization to boost profitability.
The average check for Haus in Indonesia is 47.7K IDR, a substantial 69.9% increase year-over-year. This indicates that customers are spending significantly more per visit compared to last year. The Java region mirrors this average check value at 47.7K IDR.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence. Expansion correlates with growth and accessibility for customers.
Haus has 95 outlets in the Java region of Indonesia. This reflects a solid presence and network for serving customers within this area. All of the brand's outlets are located in Java.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and cross-visitation patterns, informing strategies to gain market share and customer loyalty.
The top brands visited by Haus customers include Haus! CIPINANG (7.16%), Haus UII Jakal (6.61%), Haus! Royal Plaza (6.06%), HAUS! Indonesia (5.92%), and Haus! Citra garden 7 (5.37%). High cross-visitation suggests shared customer preferences and potential for Haus to leverage these insights.
Understanding traffic workload helps optimize staffing and resource allocation for peak hours, enhancing service efficiency and customer experience.
Traffic workload for Haus peaks between 18:00 and 20:00, reaching 62.54% at 19:00. The lowest traffic is between 1:00 and 5:00. This data indicates when Haus experiences the highest customer activity, allowing for optimized resource management.
Consumer segment analysis tailors marketing by understanding demographics, maximizing engagement and brand resonance.
Haus's customer base has a high affinity with women (89) and an even higher affinity with men (109). Among generations, Gen Y shows the strongest affinity (109), while Gen X is lower than average (71) and Gen Z is slightly below average (90).