Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Pollo Pepe is in the top 4% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Pollo Pepe performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Pollo Pepe performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Pollo Pepe' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Pollo Pepe' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals competitive strength and customer preference, showing brand's share of foot traffic in the industry.
Pollo Pepe's MARKET PERFORMANCE stands at the 96th percentile, indicating a leading position. This shows that Pollo Pepe is in the top 4% of brands. Performance peers include Sid's Diner, Mauka Indian Cuisine, Ambrosia 30A Prime Seafood & Steaks, El Favorito Taqueria, Suvai - The Taste Of India and La Hacienda.
Customer satisfaction is critical for loyalty and growth, reflecting the quality of experience and services provided by a brand.
Pollo Pepe's overall customer satisfaction is at 98%, up by 1.8 percentage points year-over-year. In Texas, the CSAT is also 98%, with an increase of 1.8 percentage points. This high satisfaction suggests strong customer loyalty and positive brand perception.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, crucial for revenue insights and understanding pricing strategy effectiveness.
Pollo Pepe's average check is $19.8, a 5.2% increase year-over-year. In Texas, the average check is also $19.8, showing no change compared to previous period. The increase indicates customers are spending more per visit.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence, reflecting expansion strategy and potential customer access points.
Pollo Pepe has 1 outlet in Texas. This indicates a limited, but potentially focused, market presence in the region. This may point to room to expand or consolidate locations for better market penetration.
Identifying key competitors through cross-visitation patterns helps in strategic positioning and understanding competitive landscape.
Pollo Pepe's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are Taco Cabana (10.71%), Los Trompos Tacos de Barrio (7.14%), Applebee's Grill + Bar (7.14%), McDonald's (7.14%), and bb.q Chicken (3.57%). This data shows the brands that share Pollo Pepe's customer base.
Traffic workload insights inform staffing and resource allocation, optimizing operations to meet peak demand and improve service efficiency.
Pollo Pepe experiences peak traffic between 12 PM and 2 PM, with the highest workload at 1 PM (85%). Traffic starts picking up at 10 AM (35.14%) and declines after 6 PM. This data helps optimize staffing during peak hours.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, optimizing messaging and offers to resonate with specific demographic groups.
Pollo Pepe's customer base shows a strong affinity toward women (Index=91, -9.33) and men (Index=108, +7.93). Generationally, Gen X is under-indexed (Index=86, -13.71), while Gen Y shows higher affinity (Index=104, +3.98) and Gen Z is slightly under-indexed (Index=95, -5.01).