Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Pío Pío is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Pío Pío performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Pío Pío performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Pío Pío' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Pío Pío' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand's strength and customer preference in the cafe & restaurant industry, showing competitive success.
Pío Pío, with a market performance percentile of 98, is a leading brand, indicating a substantial share of foot traffic. This signifies strong customer preference. Performance peers include Morazan Restaurant, Brunchaholics, Batch New Southern Kitchen and Tap, Wateishoku Kaneda, Santé, and MI VIDA, all with a percentile of 98.
CSAT reflects customer loyalty and overall brand perception, influencing repeat business and positive word-of-mouth referrals.
Pío Pío's overall CSAT is 73%, a decrease of 9.9 percentage points year-over-year. Virginia shows strong satisfaction at 87% with a 1.2pp increase. New York is at 68% with a 13.7pp decrease, suggesting a need for focused improvements in New York locations.
Average check reflects spending per customer, impacting revenue and profitability. It highlights pricing strategy and customer purchasing behavior.
Pío Pío's overall average check is $45.70, a decrease of 4.5% year-over-year. New York locations have an average check of $46.50, while Virginia locations average $43.30. This indicates varying spending habits across locations.
Outlet count indicates market presence and expansion strategy, reflecting brand reach and potential revenue generation capabilities.
Pío Pío has 4 outlets in New York and 1 in Virginia. The distribution shows a concentrated presence in New York, suggesting it as a key market. Expanding into other states could broaden the brand's reach.
Competitor analysis identifies key players attracting similar customers, informing strategies for differentiation and market share growth.
McDonald's (4.21%), Red Robin Gourmet Burgers and Brews (3.16%), Chick-fil-A (3.16%), Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen (2.11%), and Nepali Bhanchha Ghar (2.11%) are top competitors, indicating shared customer interests and potential cross-visitation opportunities.
Understanding traffic workload helps optimize staffing, manage resources, and improve customer experience during peak hours.
Pío Pío experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 9 PM, with the highest workload around 6 PM (62.54%). Minimal activity is observed between midnight and 10 AM, guiding operational adjustments based on hourly demand.
Understanding consumer segments is strategically important for tailored marketing, product positioning, and enhanced customer engagement efforts.
Pío Pío's consumer base shows a high affinity towards women (79% affinity). Men are overrepresented (118% affinity). Gen X (107% affinity) and Gen Y (117% affinity) are strongly represented, while Gen Z (64% affinity) shows lower affinity.