Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Pepper Lunch is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Pepper Lunch performance in the Japan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Pepper Lunch performance in the Japan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Pepper Lunch' competitors in the Japan
An analysis of Pepper Lunch' competitors in the Japan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Pepper Lunch is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99 in Japan's Cafe & Restaurants industry. This indicates a strong market standing relative to its peers. Performance peers in a similar range include Tsukishima Monja Moheji - Main Shop, Melting hamburger steak Fukuyoshi Asakusa Kuramae, Hakataya, トロ政 有楽町日比谷店, 炭火焼肉 伏見屋 飛騨牛 別邸 and Kyushu Jangara.
CSAT reflects how well Pepper Lunch meets customer expectations, a key driver of loyalty and repeat business. Monitor trends to identify areas for improvement.
Overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) for Pepper Lunch in Japan is 75%, a 6.7 percentage point increase year-over-year. Nagasaki Prefecture shows the highest CSAT at 100% with a 28.2 percentage point increase. Kanagawa Prefecture experienced a decrease in CSAT (-6.1pp), indicating potential areas for review.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, informing pricing strategies and identifying opportunities to increase revenue per transaction.
The overall average check for Pepper Lunch in Japan is 1.4K JPY, a 7.4% increase year-over-year. Osaka Prefecture has the highest average check at 1.5K JPY. Kanagawa, Aichi and Chiba Prefectures have average check of 1.3k JPY.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion. Tracking distribution across regions helps assess market penetration and growth opportunities.
Pepper Lunch has a significant presence in Japan, with the highest number of outlets in Fukuoka Prefecture (14). Kanagawa (12) and Chiba (11) also show strong outlet numbers, indicating key markets for the brand.
Understanding key competitors and customer overlap informs strategies to differentiate Pepper Lunch and attract a larger customer base.
Customers of Pepper Lunch also frequently visit McDonald's (12.58% cross-visitation), Starbucks (7.86%), Matsuya (7.55%), 店 (7.55%) and Saizeriya (6.92%). This reveals the competitive landscape and potential areas for targeted promotions.
Traffic workload highlights peak hours, enabling staffing optimization and resource allocation to enhance customer experience during busy periods.
Pepper Lunch experiences peak traffic workload between 11:00 and 20:00, with the highest activity around 12:00-13:00 (approximately 60). Traffic is minimal between midnight and 8:00.
Analyzing consumer segments by Gender and Generation informs targeted marketing, product development, and overall positioning strategies.
Women have an affinity index of 80, suggesting they are under-indexed. Men have an affinity index of 112, indicating a higher-than-average affinity. Gen X has an affinity index of 179, indicating significant over-representation, while Gen Y and Gen Z have affinity indexes of 75 and 50 respectively, showing they are under-indexed.