Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
LOCAL Public Eatery is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence LOCAL Public Eatery performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence LOCAL Public Eatery performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of LOCAL Public Eatery' competitors in the United States
An analysis of LOCAL Public Eatery' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
LOCAL Public Eatery's Market Performance is at the 98th percentile, indicating a leading market position. This shows strong customer preference. Performance peers include Vida Verde, The Lost Draft, Montana Mike's Steakhouse, Taste 1864, Dessert a Crêpe, and Wilde on the Porch, all within the same percentile.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects how well the brand meets customer expectations, influencing loyalty and repeat business.
LOCAL Public Eatery's overall customer satisfaction is 86%, up 11.7 percentage points year-over-year, indicating improved customer perception. In Washington, the CSAT is 81%, up 6.6 percentage points. The CSAT trend from April to June 2025 shows a fluctuation with a peak in June.
Average check is crucial for understanding customer spending habits and revenue generation per transaction.
LOCAL Public Eatery's overall average check is $40.7, a 6.4% increase year-over-year, signaling increased customer spending. In Washington, the average check is $44.1, while in Texas it is $36.9. The average check trend fluctuated between April and June 2025, peaking in May.
Tracking the number of outlets indicates the brand's expansion and market reach.
LOCAL Public Eatery has one outlet in Texas and one in Washington. Maintaining outlets in key states ensures consistent brand presence and service availability.
Identifying top competitors provides insights into market dynamics and competitive strategies.
The top competitors for LOCAL Public Eatery, based on customer cross-visitation, include Starbucks (9.23%), McDonald's (6.15%), re:public (6.15%), Cactus (4.62%), and Chipotle Mexican Grill (4.62%). These brands capture a portion of LOCAL Public Eatery's potential customer base.
Analyzing traffic workload helps optimize staffing and resource allocation throughout the day.
LOCAL Public Eatery experiences peak traffic between 17:00 and 20:00, with the highest workload around 19:00 (58.43). Traffic is minimal between 02:00 and 08:00. Staffing should align with these peak hours to ensure optimal service.
Understanding consumer demographics helps tailor marketing efforts and product offerings for maximum impact.
Women are slightly overrepresented among LOCAL Public Eatery's customers (102 affinity index), while men are slightly underrepresented (98). Gen Z is highly overrepresented (260), Gen Y is also overrepresented (123), and Gen X is underrepresented (32). Marketing could focus on Gen Z and Y.