Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Leopold's Tavern is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Leopold's Tavern performance in the Canada and how they change over time
See what factors influence Leopold's Tavern performance in the Canada and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Leopold's Tavern' competitors in the Canada
An analysis of Leopold's Tavern' competitors in the Canada
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows a brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Leopold's Tavern is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99 in the Cafe & Restaurants industry in Canada. This percentile positions Leopold's Tavern as a leading brand, indicating a strong market presence. Performance peers in a similar range include Mr. Puffs, PunjabLand Restaurant, Pizza Nova, Punjabi By Nature, Jerusalem Shawarma Vancouver and Seau de Crabe Restaurant.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) is a key indicator of customer loyalty and the overall quality of customer experience.
Leopold's Tavern has an overall CSAT of 79%, which is down by 5.2 percentage points year-over-year. CSAT varies by province, with Manitoba at 90% (+6.8pp), Saskatchewan at 79% (-8.4pp), Alberta at 78% (-6.2pp), and British Columbia at 61% (-15.8pp). This indicates variability in customer satisfaction across different regions.
Average check is a key performance indicator (KPI) that reflects customer spending and revenue generation.
The overall average check for Leopold's Tavern is 35 CAD, down 1% year-over-year. Average check varies by province, with Alberta at 35.5 CAD, Manitoba at 35.4 CAD, Saskatchewan at 34.4 CAD, and British Columbia at 33.7 CAD. This indicates slight regional differences in average customer spending.
Number of outlets indicates the brand's scale and market penetration within the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Leopold's Tavern has varying numbers of outlets across Canadian provinces: Saskatchewan leads with 9 outlets, followed by Manitoba and Alberta each with 6, and British Columbia with 2. This indicates a strong presence in Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Alberta.
Identifying top competitors helps understand market dynamics and benchmark against leading industry players.
The top competitors for Leopold's Tavern, based on customer cross-visitation, are Tim Hortons (9.96%), McDonald's (7.36%), Starbucks (6.49%), Cactus Club Cafe (5.19%) and A&W Canada (5.19%). This shows that customers who visit Leopold's Tavern also frequent these popular chains.
Analyzing traffic workload by hours helps optimize staffing and resource allocation based on peak demand.
Leopold's Tavern experiences peak traffic workload between 17:00 and 19:00, with the highest workload at 18:00 (64.32%). Traffic is significantly lower during early morning hours (0:00-10:00). This indicates a need for staffing adjustments based on hourly traffic patterns.
Understanding consumer segments by Gender and Generation informs targeted marketing and positioning strategies.
Women are overrepresented among Leopold's Tavern customers (index 108), while Men are slightly underrepresented (index 95). Gen X is significantly overrepresented (index 131), while Gen Y (index 82) and Gen Z (index 99) are underrepresented. This suggests high affinity with Gen X, and an opportunity to engage Gen Y and Z.