Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
La Mansion is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence La Mansion performance in the Mexico and how they change over time
See what factors influence La Mansion performance in the Mexico and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of La Mansion' competitors in the Mexico
An analysis of La Mansion' competitors in the Mexico
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
La Mansion's market performance is at the 99th percentile, indicating a leading position in the Cafe & Restaurants industry in Mexico. This suggests a strong brand presence and customer preference compared to its peers. Performance peers in the same percentile range include Los Canarios, EL 9 Argentino Grill, Terraza ALV, Pozolería Matamoros, Mariscos Chilo, and Pam-Pam Sushi.
Customer satisfaction reflects the loyalty, and service quality.
La Mansion's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 79%, a decrease of 8.2 percentage points year-over-year. CSAT varies by location, with San Luis Potosí showing 85% satisfaction and growth of 35 percentage points, while the State of Mexico has 68% satisfaction, down by 21.7 percentage points. Focus on State of Mexico.
Average check indicates customer spending per visit, reflecting pricing strategy, menu appeal, and customer affluence.
La Mansion's overall average check is 732.2 MXN, a 5.2% increase year-over-year, signaling potential pricing power or increased order value. The State of Mexico shows an average check of 605.7 MXN. The trend shows increasing average check from April (628.41 MXN) to June (801.61 MXN).
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and expansion, showing business growth and market penetration across regions.
La Mansion has a total of 7 outlets. The State of Mexico has 4 outlets, while Chiapas, San Luis Potosí, and Sonora each have 1 outlet. This distribution reflects the brand's geographic presence, concentrated in the State of Mexico.
Competitor analysis identifies key players and customer preferences, informing competitive strategies and market positioning.
The top competitors for La Mansion, based on cross-visitation, are Starbucks (9.50%), Toks (7.82%), La Casa de Toño (5.59%), VIPS (4.47%), and Carl's Jr. (3.35%). These brands are frequently visited by La Mansion's customers, indicating shared customer preferences.
Traffic workload reveals peak hours, enabling staffing, resource allocation, and service optimization for customer satisfaction.
La Mansion experiences peak traffic workload between 12:00 PM and 4:00 PM, with the highest traffic around 3:00 PM (53.42%). Traffic is minimal between 1:00 AM and 6:00 AM. This data informs staffing and resource allocation to manage peak demand effectively.
Consumer segment analysis enables targeted marketing by identifying key demographics, tailoring messaging, and optimizing channel selection.
La Mansion's customer base consists predominantly of women. The affinity index for women is 71, while for men is 119, indicating higher-than-average engagement from men and a lower engagement from women. The index for Gen X is 61, for Gen Y is 59, pointing to lower-than-average engagement from both generations.