Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Karayama is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Karayama performance in the Japan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Karayama performance in the Japan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Karayama' competitors in the Japan
An analysis of Karayama' competitors in the Japan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals Karayama's competitive strength and customer preference, reflecting its share of foot traffic in the industry.
Karayama is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99.00, placing it in the top 1% within Japan's Cafe & Restaurants industry. This signifies a strong market standing compared to its peers, including Daiki-suisan, Samoyed Cafe Al Osaka Kitahorie Branch, 餃子のかっちゃん紙屋町店, WEST, Tori Ichidai and Manmaru, which are within the same percentile range.
CSAT reflects customer loyalty and service quality, directly impacting brand reputation and repeat business, essential for sustained growth.
Karayama's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 74.00%, a 1.50 percentage point increase year-over-year. Gunma Prefecture shows the highest CSAT at 95.00% with a 22.70 percentage point increase, while Kochi Prefecture has 94.00% but decreased by 5.90 percentage points. CSAT peaked in May 2025 before declining slightly.
Average check indicates customer spending habits, reflecting menu pricing strategy effectiveness and potential revenue optimization opportunities.
Karayama's overall average check is 748 JPY, a 10.70% increase year-over-year. Kanagawa Prefecture shows an average check of 692.30 JPY. The average check increased over the observed period, peaking in June 2025 at 858.97 JPY.
Outlet count reflects brand reach and market penetration, crucial for assessing expansion success and geographic performance.
Karayama has the most outlets in Kanagawa Prefecture with 15 locations, followed by Aichi Prefecture with 13, and Saitama Prefecture with 12. Osaka Prefecture has 10 outlets, while Chiba Prefecture counts 7. Hokkaido and Gifu Prefectures have 3 outlets each.
Identifying competitors reveals market dynamics and helps refine strategies to enhance competitive positioning and attract customers.
Karayama's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (14.07%), 店 (9.95%), Sukiya (9.09%), Marugame Seimen (8.06%), and Matsuya (7.72%). This indicates customers who visit Karayama also frequently visit these fast-food and dining chains.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation, ensuring efficient operations and improved customer experience during peak hours.
Karayama experiences peak traffic workload between 12:00 PM and 7:00 PM, with the highest workload at 12:00 PM (78.08). Traffic is minimal during the early morning hours (0:00 AM to 9:00 AM).
Consumer segmentation allows targeted marketing, aligning products and messages with specific demographics, enhancing engagement and ROI.
Karayama's customer base shows a high affinity towards women (76%, under-indexed) and men (114%, over-indexed). Gen X (117%, over-indexed) and Gen Z (145%, over-indexed) show higher affinity, while Gen Y (80%, under-indexed) is less represented.