Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
FISHBOWL is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence FISHBOWL performance in the Australia and how they change over time
See what factors influence FISHBOWL performance in the Australia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of FISHBOWL' competitors in the Australia
An analysis of FISHBOWL' competitors in the Australia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand's share of foot traffic, showing competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
FISHBOWL in Australia's Cafe & Restaurants industry holds a leading market position with a percentile of 99.00, placing it in the top 1%. This high percentile indicates a strong market presence relative to its peers like Dae Jang Kum, Kumo Desserts Melbourne, LONGTIME DINING, Julia's, Maries Pizza, and Vespa Rossa Degraves, all positioned at the 99th percentile.
Customer satisfaction reflects loyalty. A higher score indicates a stronger customer base and potential for repeat business and positive word-of-mouth.
FISHBOWL shows a strong customer satisfaction with an overall CSAT score of 77.00%, a 2.1 percentage point increase year-over-year. Victoria leads with 80.00% (up 12pp), followed by New South Wales at 78.00% (up 3.8pp). Queensland lags at 74.00% (down 4.5pp). CSAT fluctuated between 76.34% and 79.31% from April to June 2025.
Average check indicates how much customers spend per visit, crucial for revenue projections and understanding customer spending habits.
FISHBOWL's average check is 19.00 AUD, a 17.70% increase year-over-year. New South Wales has the highest average check at 20.20 AUD. The average check value has risen from 17.59 AUD in April 2025 to 21.43 AUD by June 2025. Victoria is 18.6 AUD, Queensland is 17.4 AUD.
Outlet count shows brand's reach. More outlets often mean greater convenience for customers and higher market penetration.
FISHBOWL has a total of 43 outlets in Australia. New South Wales leads with 24 outlets, followed by Queensland with 10, and Victoria with 9. The outlet distribution highlights the brand's varying presence across different states.
Understanding competitors reveals where customers go beyond your brand, informing strategies to enhance loyalty and attract new patrons.
FISHBOWL's top competitors, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (7.83%), Guzman y Gomez (3.48%), Hungry Jack's Burgers (3.48%), Anita Gelato (2.61%), and Subway (2.61%). This indicates shared customer interest in fast food and dessert options.
Traffic patterns shape staffing, inventory. Understanding peak times helps maximize efficiency and improve customer experience.
FISHBOWL experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 7 PM, with the highest workload occurring between 12 PM and 1 PM (60.36%). Traffic is minimal outside these hours, indicating a strong lunch and dinner crowd. Consider adjusting resources and staffing to accommodate workload.
Consumer segments show who your customers are. Gender and generational data helps personalize marketing and enhance product appeal.
FISHBOWL's customer base shows high affinity among women (index 119) compared to men (index 86). Gen X (index 205) and Gen Z (index 140) over-index, while Gen Y (index 67) under-indexes. These affinity indices point to segment’s representation relative to the average consumer.