Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Fat Phill's is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Fat Phill's performance in the Netherlands and how they change over time
See what factors influence Fat Phill's performance in the Netherlands and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Fat Phill's' competitors in the Netherlands
An analysis of Fat Phill's' competitors in the Netherlands
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference within the Cafe & Restaurants sector.
Fat Phill's in the Netherlands holds a leading market performance at the 99th percentile within the Cafe & Restaurants industry. This signifies a strong market position, indicating high customer preference relative to competitors like O'Panuozzo, De Pannekoekenbakker, Bakker Bart, Bregje, Winkel 43, and Hard Rock Cafe, which are also at the 99th percentile.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception, impacting loyalty and growth. Monitoring changes identifies areas for improvement to boost customer retention.
Fat Phill's in the Netherlands has a customer satisfaction rate of 73%, a significant increase of 8.8 percentage points year-over-year. This indicates improved customer perception and suggests that initiatives to enhance customer experience are proving effective.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, influencing revenue. Monitoring trends informs pricing strategies and identifies opportunities to increase sales.
The average check for Fat Phill's in the Netherlands is 21.10 EUR, which has decreased by 12.90% year-over-year. This indicates a decline in customer spending per visit, suggesting a need to analyze pricing strategies or menu offerings to boost revenue per transaction.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence. Tracking growth helps assess expansion effectiveness and identify geographic opportunities.
Fat Phill's has 17 outlets in the Netherlands. This shows brand's established physical presence. Further analysis is needed to assess if this number is optimal for the market and if expansion is needed.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences. Understanding cross-visitation informs competitive strategies and partnership opportunities.
The top competitors for Fat Phill's in the Netherlands, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (6.62%), New York Pizza (5.88%), Wawburger (3.68%), Teds (2.94%), and Chun Café (2.94%). This indicates that customers who visit Fat Phill's also frequent these establishments.
Traffic workload shows peak hours, helping optimize staffing and resource allocation for better customer service and operational efficiency during busiest times.
Fat Phill's in the Netherlands experiences peak traffic workload between 12:00 and 20:00, with the highest traffic around 18:00 (52.30%). This information is crucial for optimizing staffing, inventory management, and promotional activities to cater to peak customer demand.
Understanding consumer segments informs targeted marketing and positioning. Gender and generation insights highlight affinity and tailor strategies to each segment.
Fat Phill's customer base in the Netherlands shows a gender mix where women are under-indexed (66), suggesting lower engagement compared to the average. Men are over-indexed (119), indicating higher-than-average affinity. For generations, Gen X is under-indexed (66), while Gen Y (140) and Gen Z (179) are strongly over-indexed, suggesting particularly high affinity among these younger demographics.