Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
COSMO | All You Can Eat World Buffet Restaurant is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence COSMO | All You Can Eat World Buffet Restaurant performance in the Ireland and how they change over time
See what factors influence COSMO | All You Can Eat World Buffet Restaurant performance in the Ireland and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of COSMO | All You Can Eat World Buffet Restaurant' competitors in the Ireland
An analysis of COSMO | All You Can Eat World Buffet Restaurant' competitors in the Ireland
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance reveals a brand’s share of foot traffic, reflecting its competitive strength and customer preference within the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
COSMO is a leading brand, ranking in the top 1% in Ireland. This shows strong customer preference. Performance peers include Xian Street Food Dublin, Café en Seine, Toca Tapioca House, Pizza Max, Sunny South Yeast Bakery and Catering, and Room4 Coffee House.
Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) indicates loyalty, impacting repurchase rates and brand advocacy. High CSAT often correlates with positive word-of-mouth and revenue growth.
COSMO's overall CSAT is 80%, showing an 18.4 percentage point increase year-over-year. This indicates improved customer perception. In Leinster, CSAT also stands at 80%, aligning with the overall positive trend.
Average Check reflects customer spending per visit. Monitoring this metric helps understand pricing strategies and customer spending habits over time.
The overall average check for COSMO is €35.10, which is a 10.6% decrease year-over-year. In Leinster, the average check also stands at €35.10. Monitoring is important to understand the reasons for the drop.
Number of Outlets indicates brand reach and market presence. Expansion reflects growth strategy, while stability suggests market consolidation.
COSMO currently operates one outlet in Leinster, Ireland. This indicates a focused market presence within this specific region. There were no changes during reporting period.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences, informing strategies for differentiation and market share growth.
COSMO's top competitors include McDonald's (10%), Nando's (8%), Supermac's & Papa John's (6%), Burger King (4%), and Baxto's (4%). This shows customer overlap, guiding competitive strategies.
Traffic Workload highlights peak hours, informing staffing, marketing, and resource allocation for optimal efficiency and customer experience.
COSMO experiences peak traffic between 12:00 and 21:00, with the highest workload around 17:00-18:00. Staffing and resources should be optimized to handle peak customer flow during these hours.
Analyzing consumer segments by Gender and Generation informs targeted marketing, improving engagement and ROI by aligning with distinct consumer characteristics.
COSMO sees over-representation from men (124 affinity index) compared to women (61 affinity index). Gen Y (117) is over-represented, while Gen Z (46) is under-represented, indicating varied generational affinity.