Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Asakuma is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Asakuma performance in the Japan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Asakuma performance in the Japan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Asakuma' competitors in the Japan
An analysis of Asakuma' competitors in the Japan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals competitive strength and customer preference, indicating brand share of foot traffic in the industry.
Asakuma's market performance is at the 99th percentile, indicating a leading position in the Cafe & Restaurants industry in Japan. This shows a strong market presence and customer preference. Performance peers in the same range include Shinjidai, Ramen Hayashida, 焼肉ごりちゃん, 魚吉酒場 池袋店, Yakiniku Washino, and HaiDiLao Ikebukuro East Entrance Branch.
CSAT reflects customer happiness, directly impacting loyalty and revenue. Tracking CSAT ensures service quality and identifies areas for improvement.
Asakuma's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 77%, a 4.5 percentage point increase year-over-year, indicating improved customer sentiment. Gifu Prefecture shows the highest CSAT at 97% with a 29.7 percentage point growth, while Kanagawa Prefecture has 82% CSAT with 8.7 percentage point growth.
Average check size shows how much customers spend per visit. Monitoring this helps in pricing strategies and understanding customer spending habits.
Asakuma's overall average check is 2.3K JPY, a 1.6% increase year-over-year. Chiba Prefecture shows the highest average check at 2.6K JPY. Overall, average check increased, showing customers are spending slightly more per visit.
Outlet count shows brand reach. Expansion indicates growth, while maintaining outlets ensures consistent brand presence and market coverage.
Asakuma has 18 outlets in Aichi Prefecture, the highest number among all locations. Shizuoka Prefecture has 9 outlets, while Kanagawa, Gifu, Chiba, and Mie Prefectures each have between 3-5 outlets. This distribution indicates a concentration of outlets in Aichi.
Competitor analysis reveals customer preferences and market dynamics, enabling strategic positioning and competitive advantage.
The top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (7.39%), 店 (6.51%), Komeda's Coffee (6.16%), Hama Sushi (6.16%), and Starbucks (5.81%). This indicates that Asakuma customers also frequently visit these brands, suggesting potential areas for competitive focus.
Traffic workload distribution shows peak hours, guiding staffing and resource allocation for better customer service.
Asakuma's peak traffic workload occurs between 12:00 and 13:00 (63.57% and 61.08% respectively), with significant activity from 11:00 to 20:00. Traffic workload is minimal during nighttime hours, indicating operational hours align with customer demand.
Consumer segments inform targeted marketing, maximizing engagement by understanding customer demographics and generational preferences.
Women overindex (84) compared to men (109). Gen X shows high affinity (162), while Gen Y is under-indexed (68) and Gen Z is around average (101). This suggests targeted marketing strategies can leverage Gen X's strong interest.