Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Apollo Burger is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Apollo Burger performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Apollo Burger performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Apollo Burger' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Apollo Burger' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals competitive strength and customer preference, indicating brand's share of foot traffic in the industry.
Apollo Burger's market performance is in the top 1% demonstrating a leading position. This high percentile indicates strong customer preference and competitiveness compared to peers like State of Confusion, Sports Grill, Oakberry Açaí, Sugar Hill Cafe, Federales Denver and Papichulo Tacos.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) is vital as it reflects customer loyalty and impacts brand reputation, directly influencing repeat business and revenue.
Apollo Burger's overall CSAT is 71%, a decrease of 23.3 percentage points year-over-year. This decline suggests a need to investigate factors impacting customer experience to improve satisfaction levels. The CSAT in Utah is also 71% with the same decrease.
Average check is key for profitability, reflecting customer spending per visit and the effectiveness of upselling and menu pricing strategies.
Apollo Burger's overall average check is $15.80, a decrease of 14.2% year-over-year. This decline indicates customers are spending less per visit, suggesting a need to analyze menu offerings and pricing strategies. Average check in Utah is $15.80.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market penetration, directly impacting revenue potential and brand visibility in different geographic areas.
Apollo Burger has 13 outlets in Utah. Maintaining this number indicates a stable physical presence in the region during the specified period, reflecting consistent brand availability to customers.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer cross-visitation, revealing competitive landscape and opportunities for targeted marketing.
Apollo Burger's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (16.67%), Taco Bell (7.21%), Wendy's (7.21%), Little Caesars Pizza (6.76%), and Olive Garden Italian Restaurant (6.76%). This data indicates shared customer interest in these brands.
Traffic workload analysis reveals peak hours and customer flow, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation to maximize service quality.
Apollo Burger experiences peak traffic workload between 11:00 AM and 7:00 PM, with the highest workload at 12:00 PM (66.78%). This data suggests staffing and resource allocation should be optimized to handle peak demand efficiently.
Understanding consumer segments allows for tailored marketing, improving engagement and ROI by addressing specific demographic preferences and needs.
Apollo Burger's customer base shows Women demonstrate higher affinity (61%, under-indexed) and Men demonstrate higher affinity (133%, over-indexed). Within generations, Gen X (110%, over-indexed) and Gen Y (105%, over-indexed) have higher affinity than Gen Z (70%, under-indexed).