Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Sugar Llamas performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Sugar Llamas performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Sugar Llamas' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Sugar Llamas' competitors in the United States
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Sugar Llamas is in the top 3% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the cafe industry.
Sugar Llamas holds a leading market performance percentile of 97 in the United States' Cafe & Restaurants industry. This indicates a strong competitive position, capturing a significant share of customer foot traffic and preference, along with brands like Kagura Japanese Restaurant, Coriander, Tiny Lou's, NYC Bagel & Deli, Paradiso, and Tandoori Flame.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception, impacting loyalty and revenue. Monitoring changes informs service improvements and targeted marketing.
Sugar Llamas' overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 84%, a 5.2 percentage point decrease year-over-year. Connecticut shows the highest CSAT at 95% with 5.3 percentage points increase, while Arkansas shows the biggest drop, -11.3 percentage points. Performance has varied significantly across states.
Average check indicates customer spending habits. Tracking changes helps optimize pricing strategies and menu offerings for increased revenue.
Sugar Llamas' overall average check is $8.80, a 13.8% decrease year-over-year. Oklahoma has the highest average check at $10.00, while Arkansas shows $5.70. Average check performance varies significantly by location.
Outlet count reflects brand presence, affecting market penetration and revenue potential. Monitoring distribution helps optimize growth strategies.
Sugar Llamas has a total of 12 outlets in the United States. The distribution is concentrated in Oklahoma (5 outlets) and Arkansas (3 outlets), with fewer locations in Texas (2 outlets), Connecticut (1 outlet), and Kansas (1 outlet).
Understanding key competitors helps refine market strategies, improve customer acquisition, and identify opportunities for differentiation and growth.
Sugar Llamas' top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (15.87%), Texas Roadhouse (7.94%), Braum's Ice Cream & Dairy Store (7.94%), In-N-Out Burger (6.35%), and Chick-fil-A (6.35%). These brands represent alternative dining choices for Sugar Llamas' customers.
Traffic workload reveals peak hours, enabling efficient staffing, resource allocation, and targeted promotions to maximize customer experience.
Sugar Llamas experiences peak traffic workload between 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM, with the highest traffic volume around 4:00 PM (56.82%). There is minimal activity between 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM.
Consumer segments highlight key customer groups, enabling personalized marketing, product development, and targeted messaging for higher engagement.
Women (affinity index 130) are overrepresented among Sugar Llamas' consumers, indicating high affinity. Men (73) are underrepresented. Gen Y (107) and Gen Z (106) also show slightly higher affinity, while Gen X (99) is close to the average.