Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence 時時香RICE BAR performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
See what factors influence 時時香RICE BAR performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of 時時香RICE BAR' competitors in the Taiwan
An analysis of 時時香RICE BAR' competitors in the Taiwan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
時時香RICE BAR's market performance is at the 54th percentile, indicating an average market standing. This means the brand's foot traffic is on par with many competitors. Performance peers in the same percentile range include 成功牛排 and 好客食堂.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer loyalty and brand perception, directly impacting revenue and long-term sustainability.
時時香RICE BAR's overall CSAT is 68%, a decrease of 22.1 percentage points year-over-year. Kaohsiung shows the highest CSAT at 79%, while Hsinchu and Taipei show lower satisfaction levels. The trend shows a slight decrease in CSAT over the last three months.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, influencing revenue strategies and menu optimization for increased profitability.
The overall average check for 時時香RICE BAR is 787.6 TWD, a decrease of 1.6% year-over-year. Taichung has the highest average check at 943.2 TWD. The average check has decreased over the last three months.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and expansion, reflecting market penetration and growth potential across different locations.
時時香RICE BAR has the most outlets in Taichung and Kaohsiung, with 5 each. New Taipei and Taipei each have 4 outlets. Other cities have fewer outlets, indicating potential for expansion in those areas.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences, informing competitive strategies and market positioning efforts.
The top competitors for 時時香RICE BAR, based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (6.09%), Starbucks (3.88%), Din Tai Fung (3.32%), 店 (2.77%), and Ba Fang Yun Ji (2.77%). This indicates that customers who visit 時時香RICE BAR also frequent these establishments.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation, ensuring efficient operations during peak hours and maximizing customer service.
Traffic workload for 時時香RICE BAR peaks between 11:00 and 21:00, with the highest traffic around 18:00-19:00. There is minimal traffic before 10:00 and after 22:00. This data can inform staffing and operational decisions.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, tailoring products and messaging to specific demographics for improved engagement.
Women are slightly under-indexed (97) and Men are slightly over-indexed (103). Gen X (116) and Gen Z (117) are over-indexed, showing high affinity, while Gen Y (88) is under-indexed, indicating lower affinity compared to the average consumer.