Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence 생활맥주 performance in the South Korea and how they change over time
See what factors influence 생활맥주 performance in the South Korea and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of 생활맥주' competitors in the South Korea
An analysis of 생활맥주' competitors in the South Korea
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
생활맥주 is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows the brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
생활맥주's market performance is in the top 1% in South Korea's Cafe & Restaurants industry, indicating a leading position. This percentile signifies high customer preference relative to competitors. Its performance peers in the same percentile range include SANS 산스 익선, DOOKUPSAM, Oatt Brunch, 뜨돈, 롤링파스타 수원역점, and Ondon.
Analyzing competitors identifies market rivals and their popularity among your customer base for strategic positioning.
The top competitors for 생활맥주, based on cross-visitation, are Daily Beer (13.43%), Hwaleug (10.45%), Keodi (10.45%), 생활맥주 강남역점 (8.96%), and 숙성도 부산광안리점｜Busan Korea BBQ Samgyeopsal suksungdo｜サムギョプサル 焼き肉 焼肉 (7.46%). This indicates the brands that 생활맥주's customers also frequent.
Understanding consumer segments by Gender and Generation informs targeted marketing and positioning strategies.
Women are overrepresented among 생활맥주's consumers, with an affinity index of 113, while men are slightly underrepresented at 91. Gen Y exhibits high affinity (147), while Gen X shows an average affinity (99). This indicates the strength of different consumer segments.