Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Rajdhani performance in the India and how they change over time
See what factors influence Rajdhani performance in the India and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Rajdhani is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Search among the top brands by number of locations
An analysis of Rajdhani' competitors in the India
An analysis of Rajdhani' competitors in the India
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market Performance reveals competitive strength, indicating customer preference and brand's dominance through foot traffic share.
Rajdhani, with a 99th percentile Market Performance in India's Cafe & Restaurants industry, is a leading brand. This indicates a very strong market presence. Its performance peers, including Vasuvettante Kada, Rajugari Thota Hotel, Madurai Food Palace, Palms n Sands Beach Resto-bar, Hotel Saroj Dhaba, and Kairali Kerala Resturant, are also within the leading percentile range, highlighting intense competition at the top.
Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception. High CSAT scores correlate with loyalty, repeat business, and positive word-of-mouth.
Rajdhani shows a strong Customer Satisfaction with an overall CSAT score of 90%, reflecting an 8.1 percentage point increase year-over-year. Karnataka leads with 91%, followed by Maharashtra (89%) and Tamil Nadu (86%). All locations show growth. Dynamic CSAT data shows a fluctuation between 89.69% and 90.87% from May to July 2025, suggesting stable customer sentiment.
Average Check (AvgCheck) shows customer spending per visit. It reflects pricing strategy, menu appeal and customers' economic value.
Rajdhani's overall Average Check is 881.6 INR, a 5% increase year-over-year, indicating higher customer spending. Karnataka has the highest Average Check at 908.9 INR. Maharashtra follows with 859.2 INR. Tamil Nadu has 720 INR. The Average Check fluctuated between 913.97 INR and 847.26 INR from May to July 2025.
Outlet count indicates market reach. More outlets can signify a stronger brand presence and higher potential revenue.
Rajdhani has 5 outlets each in Maharashtra and Karnataka, indicating a strong presence in these states. Delhi has 2 outlets. Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh each have 1 outlet. This distribution reveals the brand's current geographical focus and potential areas for expansion.
Competitor analysis reveals direct rivals. Knowing competitors' visitation aids strategic positioning and competitive advantage.
Rajdhani's top competitors based on cross-visitation are Empire Restaurant (3.54%), Dindigul Thalappakatti Restaurant (3.54%), KFC (3.32%), McDonald's (3.32%), and Polar Bear Ice Cream (3.10%). This data indicates that customers who visit Rajdhani also frequent these brands, pointing to potential areas for competitive focus and differentiation.
Traffic Workload indicates peak hours. Understanding traffic distribution informs staffing, promotions, and resource allocation.
Rajdhani experiences peak traffic workload between 12:00 and 22:00, with the highest activity around 21:00 (52.24). There is very low activity between 0:00 and 9:00. This reveals customer preferences for dining during lunch and dinner hours, crucial for optimizing staffing and service strategies.
Consumer segments help tailor marketing. Gender and generational insights enable targeted messaging and product development.
Rajdhani's consumer base shows a high affinity among women (Index 149) and Gen Z (Index 129), suggesting these segments are overrepresented. Men are underrepresented (Index 83). Gen X shows an index of 108, with Gen Y having a lower representation at 95.