Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Papa Johns Pizza performance in the Egypt and how they change over time
See what factors influence Papa Johns Pizza performance in the Egypt and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Papa Johns Pizza' competitors in the Egypt
An analysis of Papa Johns Pizza' competitors in the Egypt
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Papa Johns Pizza is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Papa Johns Pizza holds a leading market performance percentile of 99 in Egypt, placing it in the top 1%. This indicates a strong competitive position. Performance peers in the same percentile range include Karam El Sham, Monginis, villa caracas, Sizzler Steak House, El-Salah Al-Nabi, and Villa Caracas.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception, influencing loyalty and repurchase rates. Tracking CSAT helps identify areas for service improvement.
Overall customer satisfaction for Papa Johns Pizza in Egypt is 44%, a decrease of 6.2 percentage points year-over-year. Giza shows the highest CSAT at 60%, while Alexandria has the lowest at 13%. Cairo shows an increase of 4.4 percentage points. This highlights a need to investigate the reasons behind declining satisfaction in Alexandria.
Average check indicates customer spending per transaction, vital for revenue forecasting and menu optimization strategies.
The overall average check for Papa Johns Pizza in Egypt is 464 EGP, showing a slight decrease of 0.1% year-over-year. Giza has the highest average check at 480 EGP, while Cairo has the lowest at 439.8 EGP. Average check remained stable across all locations.
Outlet count reflects brand reach and accessibility, impacting market penetration and revenue potential in different regions.
Papa Johns Pizza has a total of 73 outlets in Egypt. Cairo has the highest number of outlets with 38, followed by Giza with 14 and Alexandria with 9. This distribution indicates a concentration of outlets in major metropolitan areas.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and cross-visitation patterns, informing strategies to enhance market share and customer retention.
The top competitors for Papa Johns Pizza in Egypt, based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (17.32%), KFC (7.36%), Koshary El Tahrir (6.06%), Starbucks (6.06%), and Pizza Hut (4.76%). McDonald's has significantly higher cross-visitation, indicating that a large portion of Papa John's customers also visit McDonald's.
Traffic workload analysis reveals peak hours, enabling staffing optimization and targeted promotions to maximize sales efficiency.
Papa Johns Pizza in Egypt experiences peak traffic workload between 6 PM and 10 PM, with the highest workload at 56.49% at 10 PM. Traffic is minimal between 3 AM and 9 AM. This data suggests focusing resources during peak hours to handle customer demand effectively.
Understanding consumer segments by gender and generation helps tailor marketing and product strategies for maximum impact.
Consumer segments reveal that Women(53%, but the affinity is under-indexed), Gen Y, and Gen Z show high affinity. Men (118%, and affinity is over-indexed). Gen X shows low affinity (67% which is under-indexed), Gen Y shows 112%(over-indexed), Gen Z shows 178%(over-indexed). This suggests targeted campaigns focusing on women, Gen Y, and Gen Z could yield better results.