Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Miss Energy is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Miss Energy performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Miss Energy performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Miss Energy' competitors in the Taiwan
An analysis of Miss Energy' competitors in the Taiwan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals competitive strength and customer preference in the industry, reflecting brand's share of foot traffic.
Miss Energy's MARKET PERFORMANCE is at the 98th percentile, indicating a leading position in the Taiwan Cafe & Restaurants industry. This high percentile means the brand captures a significant share of customer visits compared to its peers. Performance peers within the same percentile range include: 妃鍋精緻個人平價鍋物, 不思義-義式廚房:高雄.義大利麵.燉飯.焗烤.炸物.午餐.下午茶.晚餐.宵夜.外送, 厚冶 Bakery & Cafe, 毛五木-Momori Café & Bar | 寵物友善餐廳, 燒肉風間|福科三店, 皮皮手作千層.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty, directly impacting retention and revenue through positive customer experiences.
Miss Energy's overall customer satisfaction is 62%, down 5.4 percentage points year-over-year. Taichung shows the highest satisfaction at 69% with a 9.5 percentage point increase, while Taoyuan City has the lowest at 58% with a significant decrease of 26.6 percentage points. The CSAT dynamic data shows a fluctuating trend over the three months.
Average check indicates spending per customer, crucial for revenue optimization and understanding customer purchasing behavior.
Miss Energy's overall average check is 125.5 TWD, a 4.7% decrease year-over-year. New Taipei shows an average check of 124 TWD, while Taipei has an average check of 114.3 TWD. The average check dynamic data shows fluctuations from May to July 2025, with the highest check observed in July.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and market presence, driving accessibility and potential customer acquisition.
Miss Energy has a total of 21 outlets across Taiwan. New Taipei has the highest number of outlets (9), followed by Taipei (6), Taichung (3), and Taoyuan City, Caotun Township and Puli Township each with 1 outlet.
Competitor analysis reveals market dynamics and opportunities for differentiation, informing strategic positioning and competitive advantage.
The top competitors for Miss Energy, based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (5.56%), Ba Fang Yun Ji (5.56%), Pizza Hut (3.17%), 孫東寶台式牛排教父 (3.17%), and Starbucks (3.17%). This indicates that customers who visit Miss Energy also frequent these establishments.
Traffic workload analysis identifies peak hours, enabling optimized staffing and resource allocation for enhanced customer service.
Miss Energy experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 6 PM, with the highest workload around 12 PM (51.7). There is no traffic between 8 PM and 10 AM. This data helps optimize staffing and resource allocation during peak hours.
Understanding consumer segments allows for targeted marketing and product development, increasing engagement and brand resonance.
Miss Energy's customer base is predominantly women, with an affinity index of 95%, while men show an over-indexed affinity of 105%. Gen X are over-represented with an affinity index of 182%, while Gen Y and Gen Z are under-represented, both with an affinity index of 95%.