Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Let's Eat performance in the Brazil and how they change over time
See what factors influence Let's Eat performance in the Brazil and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Let's Eat' competitors in the Brazil
An analysis of Let's Eat' competitors in the Brazil
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Let's Eat is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market Performance percentile shows the brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Let's Eat is a leading brand in Brazil's Cafe & Restaurants industry with a Market Performance percentile of 99. This indicates that Let's Eat captures a significant portion of customer traffic compared to its competitors. Other brands in a similar range are: Recanto Gaúcho, kangurus Boliche, Pão de Maçã - Nova Peruíbe, Tasty Grill Express, Duckbill Cookies & Coffee, Costelaria e Petiscaria o Rancho.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception, impacting loyalty and growth. A high CSAT indicates positive experiences and stronger customer relationships.
Let's Eat boasts an 82% customer satisfaction in Brazil, a significant 15.4 percentage point increase year-over-year. This upswing suggests improved customer experiences, leading to enhanced brand loyalty and positive word-of-mouth.
Average check reveals spending habits and revenue potential. Monitoring trends informs pricing and marketing strategies for maximizing customer value.
Let's Eat's average check in Brazil is BRL 106.6, marking a 2.6% increase year-over-year. This indicates customers are spending slightly more per visit, potentially due to menu adjustments or successful upselling strategies.
Outlet count indicates market presence and expansion strategy. Growth reflects investment, brand reach, and potential revenue streams in key regions.
Let's Eat has 17 outlets in the Southeast Region of Brazil. This shows its current physical presence and market coverage in this area.
Identifying top competitors is crucial for strategic positioning. Analyzing cross-visitation patterns highlights shared customer base and areas for differentiation.
The top competitors for Let's Eat in Brazil, based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (9.20%), Burger King (7.47%), and Outback Steakhouse (4.02%). This indicates a significant overlap in customer base with these major fast-food and casual dining chains.
Traffic workload reveals peak hours and informs staffing and resource allocation. Optimizing operations based on demand enhances customer experience and efficiency.
Let's Eat experiences peak traffic between 6 PM and 9 PM, with the highest workload around 8 PM (49.41). This data shows when the restaurant is most busy and the restaurant can schedule more employees during these times.
Consumer segment analysis by Gender and Generation is vital for targeted marketing and positioning. Affinity insights optimize outreach and maximize engagement.
Let's Eat shows high affinity with women (82 index value), suggesting higher-than-average engagement, but men are highly represented by the affinity index of 116. Gen Y also shows a high affinity (137), while Gen X is under-indexed (85).