Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Coco frutti performance in the Canada and how they change over time
See what factors influence Coco frutti performance in the Canada and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Coco frutti' competitors in the Canada
An analysis of Coco frutti' competitors in the Canada
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Coco frutti is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Coco frutti holds a leading market performance in Canada's Cafe & Restaurants industry with a percentile of 99, indicating it captures a significant share of customer traffic. Performance peers include Pizza Fiamma, Quiznos, Wayback Burgers, Lucille's, Wimpy's Diner and King Tandoori within the same top percentile. This position reflects strong customer preference and competitive strength.
Customer satisfaction is a key indicator of loyalty and brand perception, directly impacting long-term revenue and growth.
Coco frutti's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 83%, a 3.4 percentage point increase year-over-year. Quebec shows higher CSAT (85%) with a 6.2 percentage point increase, while Ontario has a lower CSAT (78%) and a decrease of 2.3 percentage points. This suggests stronger customer sentiment in Quebec compared to Ontario.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, crucial for pricing strategies and revenue forecasting to maximize profits.
The overall average check for Coco frutti is CAD 23.9, a decrease of 11.7% year-over-year. Ontario has a higher average check of CAD 29.2 with no growth, while Quebec's average check is CAD 22.5, also with no growth. The data indicates a decrease in customer spending compared to the previous year.
Outlet count reflects brand reach and market presence, indicating growth potential and accessibility for customers.
Coco frutti has 27 outlets in Quebec and 6 in Ontario. This distribution highlights a stronger presence in Quebec, indicating a larger operational scale and potentially higher brand recognition compared to Ontario.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and their customer overlap, informing strategic positioning and marketing efforts.
Coco frutti's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (18.54%), Tim Hortons (18.05%), A&W Canada (6.34%), Benny&Co. (4.39%), and Subway (4.15%). This reveals a significant overlap with major fast-food chains, suggesting that Coco frutti customers also frequent these establishments.
Understanding traffic patterns enables efficient staffing and resource allocation, optimizing customer experience and operational efficiency.
Coco frutti experiences peak traffic between 7 AM and 12 PM, with the highest workload around 10 AM and 11 AM. Traffic is minimal during the afternoon and evening. This indicates that Coco frutti is predominantly a breakfast and brunch destination.
Consumer segmentation allows targeted marketing, improving engagement by tailoring campaigns to distinct demographic preferences.
Coco frutti's customer base shows a higher affinity among women (index 120) and Gen X (index 176), indicating that those segments are overrepresented. There is relatively lower affinity among men (index 86), Gen Y (index 55) and Gen Z (index 65), suggesting that these segments are underrepresented in the consumer base.