Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
See what factors influence Chun Shui Tang performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Chun Shui Tang performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Chun Shui Tang' competitors in the Taiwan
An analysis of Chun Shui Tang' competitors in the Taiwan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Chun Shui Tang is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the cafe & restaurants industry.
Chun Shui Tang's market performance is in the top 1% percentile, indicating a leading position in Taiwan's Cafe & Restaurants industry. This means Chun Shui Tang outperforms most competitors in foot traffic and customer preference. Peers in a similar percentile range include MAGiC TOUCH.
Customer satisfaction is key to brand loyalty. Tracking CSAT helps understand customer happiness and identify areas for service improvement and operational adjustments.
Chun Shui Tang's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 66%, with a slight increase of 0.6 percentage points year-over-year. CSAT varies by city, with Taichung showing the highest satisfaction (69%) and Hsinchu showing significant growth (11.8pp). Taipei has the lowest satisfaction at 65% with a decline of 3pp.
Average check indicates customer spending per visit, reflecting pricing strategy effectiveness and customer willingness to spend at the restaurant.
Chun Shui Tang's overall average check is 395 TWD, a 1.8% increase year-over-year. Tainan has the highest average check (427.3 TWD). Taipei has the lowest average check (375.8 TWD). All growth values are 0%.
Number of outlets reflects brand's market presence. Monitoring outlet distribution helps evaluate market penetration and expansion effectiveness across regions.
Chun Shui Tang has the most outlets in Taichung (18), followed by Taipei (9). Kaohsiung and New Taipei both have 5 outlets. Other cities have fewer locations, indicating room for growth outside of Taichung and Taipei.
Identifying competitors is crucial for strategic positioning. Knowing which brands customers also visit helps refine marketing and competitive strategies for market share.
Chun Shui Tang's customers also frequently visit Starbucks (10.34%), McDonald's (6.93%), Louisa Coffee, Ba Fang Yun Ji and Kura Sushi (2.95%). This indicates that these brands are Chun Shui Tang's main competitors for the same customer base.
Understanding traffic workload helps optimize staffing and resource allocation. Knowing peak hours allows for efficient service and improved customer experience.
Chun Shui Tang experiences peak traffic workload between 11:00 and 20:00, with the highest traffic around 18:00 (66.05). There is minimal activity between midnight and 6:00, suggesting adjusted operational strategies.
Analyzing consumer segments informs targeted marketing. Gender and generation insights allow customized campaigns, enhancing relevance and resonating with specific groups.
Chun Shui Tang's customer base shows a high affinity index for Women (98) and Men (102). The brand has a high affinity index for Gen X (132) and Gen Y (117). Gen Z is under-indexed (61) relative to the average consumer.