Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Starbucks is in the top 3% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Starbucks performance in the Malta and how they change over time
See what factors influence Starbucks performance in the Malta and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Starbucks' competitors in the Malta
An analysis of Starbucks' competitors in the Malta
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market share reflects brand strength and customer preference, crucial for strategic decision-making and competitive positioning in the industry.
Starbucks in Malta holds a leading market performance position with a percentile of 97, placing it in the top 3% of brands. This indicates a strong competitive advantage, reflecting substantial customer preference. Performance peers in similar range: BeirutBay, Marrobbio, OyOy Restaurant, Ocean Basket, Burgers.Ink, Blu Beach.
CSAT is vital to gauge loyalty. Monitoring changes helps to proactively address issues, thus preventing customer churn and enhancing brand reputation.
Starbucks in Malta shows an overall customer satisfaction of 75%, a slight decrease of 1.2 percentage points year-over-year. The Central Region exhibits the highest CSAT at 78% with an increase of 11.3pp, while Northern Region has the lowest at 73% with a decrease of 12.4pp, indicating regional variations in customer experience.
Average check indicates spending per customer, vital for revenue optimization. Increases suggest enhanced value perception or upselling effectiveness.
The average check for Starbucks in Malta is 7.8 EUR, a 10.4% increase year-over-year. The Northern Region has the highest average check at 8.6 EUR. The overall increase suggests customers are spending more per visit.
Outlet count indicates market presence and accessibility. Growth reflects expansion strategy and potential for increased market reach and brand visibility.
Starbucks has varying outlet distribution across Malta, with the Central Region leading at 6 outlets. The Northern Region has 4 outlets, the South Eastern Region 3, the Southern Region 2, and Gozo Region has 1. This distribution highlights key areas of focus for Starbucks' market penetration.
Competitor analysis helps refine strategies, identify differentiation opportunities, and understand market dynamics to maintain a competitive edge.
Starbucks' main competitors in Malta include McDonald's (10.84% cross-visitation), Costa Coffee (8.43% cross-visitation), and Burgers.Ink (6.02% cross-visitation). This data highlights brands frequently visited by Starbucks customers, revealing key competitive overlaps.
Understanding traffic patterns informs staffing and promotions, optimizing resource allocation and enhancing customer experience during peak hours.
Starbucks in Malta experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 6 PM, with the highest workload around 12 PM. Traffic is minimal from 10 PM to 7 AM. This data suggests optimal staffing and promotional strategies should target peak hours.
Understanding consumer segments is important for targeted marketing, enabling tailored campaigns that resonate and improve engagement and conversion rates.
Starbucks in Malta shows a strong affinity with women (87%) and men (109%). Among generations, Gen X is over-indexed (141%), while Gen Y (79%) and Gen Z (88%) are under-indexed, reflecting varied engagement levels across demographics. Do not interpret these values as percentage of users.