Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Sate Senayan is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Sate Senayan performance in the Indonesia and how they change over time
See what factors influence Sate Senayan performance in the Indonesia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Sate Senayan' competitors in the Indonesia
An analysis of Sate Senayan' competitors in the Indonesia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Sate Senayan's market performance is at the 99th percentile, indicating a leading position in the Cafe & Restaurants industry in Indonesia. This shows a strong market presence. Performance peers in a similar range include: Nasi Kulit Mak Igun Tanjung Duren, Warung Nasi Ibu Imas, Warung Hana, Warung DJURAGAN, Saoenk Kito Ciledug, and Jatiluwih Resto.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) is a key indicator of customer loyalty and business success, reflecting how well a brand meets customer expectations.
Sate Senayan's overall customer satisfaction is 95%, a 19.8 percentage point increase year-over-year, suggesting substantial improvement in customer experience. Java shows a 94% CSAT with a 24.2 percentage point increase, while Lesser Sunda Islands has 96% with a 10.5 percentage point increase, both showing positive growth.
Average check is important for understanding customer spending habits and revenue trends. It indicates the average amount spent per transaction.
Sate Senayan's overall average check is 130.8K IDR, a 0.8% decrease year-over-year. The Lesser Sunda Islands show an average check of 151.6K IDR, while Java shows 119.4K IDR. Fluctuations in the average check impact revenue forecasts and operational strategies.
The number of outlets indicates the brand's reach and presence in different regions, reflecting its expansion and market coverage.
Sate Senayan has 13 outlets in Java and 1 outlet in Lesser Sunda Islands. This distribution highlights a strong presence in Java, but a smaller presence in Lesser Sunda Islands.
Identifying top competitors and cross-visitation patterns helps understand the competitive landscape and customer preferences.
The top competitors for Sate Senayan, based on customer cross-visitation, are Pizza Hut (7.51%), Sate (5.20%), Burger King (4.62%), Nasi Mandhi Bosgil Condet (3.47%), and La Baracca Bali (2.89%). These brands attract customers who also frequent Sate Senayan.
Analyzing traffic workload by hours helps optimize staffing and resource allocation to meet customer demand effectively.
Sate Senayan's peak traffic workload occurs between 17:00 (5 PM) and 19:00 (7 PM), reaching 71.75% at 18:00 (6 PM). Traffic is minimal between 0:00 (12 AM) and 9:00 (9 AM). Staffing and resources should be optimized for the evening peak.
Understanding consumer segments by gender and generation is strategically important for tailoring marketing and positioning strategies effectively.
Sate Senayan's consumer base shows a higher affinity towards Men (affinity index 120) compared to average, while Women are under-indexed (affinity index 75). Among generations, Gen Y shows the highest affinity (119), followed by Gen X (111), and Gen Z is significantly under-indexed (46).