Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
人从众厚切牛排 is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence 人从众厚切牛排 performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
See what factors influence 人从众厚切牛排 performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of 人从众厚切牛排' competitors in the Taiwan
An analysis of 人从众厚切牛排' competitors in the Taiwan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance indicates brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
人从众厚切牛排's market performance is at the 99th percentile, positioning it as a leading brand in Taiwan's Cafe & Restaurants industry. This high percentile indicates a strong market presence and significant customer preference compared to peers like 50 Lan, Le Ble d'Or, ISLAND BUFFET RESTAURANT, 見山景觀咖啡餐廳-桃園景觀餐廳 龍潭美食 龍潭夜景咖啡 龍潭咖啡廳 龍潭景觀餐廳 龍潭景點 桃園網美夜景 龍潭網美夜景 龍潭約會 桃園約會 咖啡廳推薦 餐廳推薦 餐酒館, 荖子鍋, and 老井極上燒肉 台中福科店, which also hold a position in the 99th percentile.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty, impacting repeat business and positive recommendations.
人从众厚切牛排 shows a strong customer satisfaction with an overall CSAT of 88%, a 15.6pp increase year-over-year. Taoyuan City leads with 95% satisfaction, while Keelung and New Taipei show lower satisfaction at 68% and 67% respectively. Customer satisfaction has fluctuated slightly between April and June 2025.
Average check reveals customer spending habits and potential revenue per transaction, guiding pricing and marketing strategies.
人从众厚切牛排's overall average check is 361.30 TWD, up 4.6% year-over-year. Kaohsiung has the highest average check at 402.90 TWD. The average check varied between 344.88 TWD and 370.28 TWD from April to June 2025.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and accessibility, influencing market penetration and brand visibility.
人从众厚切牛排 has 7 outlets in Taipei, 6 in New Taipei, 3 in Taoyuan City, and 1 each in Zhubei City, Keelung and Kaohsiung. Taipei has the highest number of outlets, suggesting a concentration of the brand's presence in that city.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences, informing competitive positioning and marketing efforts.
The top competitors for 人从众厚切牛排, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (5.05%), Ba Fang Yun Ji (2.23%), Starbucks (2.08%), SUKIYA (1.63%), and 店 (1.63%). This indicates that customers of 人从众厚切牛排 also frequently visit these brands.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation based on peak and off-peak hours.
人从众厚切牛排 experiences peak traffic workload between 17:00 and 19:00, with the highest workload at 65.02 around 18:00. Traffic is minimal between midnight and 10:00, suggesting the restaurant is primarily active during lunch and dinner hours.
Understanding consumer segments allows for targeted marketing and product development based on demographic preferences.
The affinity index shows that women (83) and men (117) show varied levels of affinity. For Generation segments, Gen X shows very high affinity (203), while Gen Y (60) and Gen Z (102) show a average and lower level, respectively.