Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Meat moot is in the top 3% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Meat moot performance in the Saudi Arabia and how they change over time
See what factors influence Meat moot performance in the Saudi Arabia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Meat moot' competitors in the Saudi Arabia
An analysis of Meat moot' competitors in the Saudi Arabia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals Meat moot's competitive strength and customer preference within the Cafe & Restaurants industry in Saudi Arabia.
Meat moot's market performance is at the 97th percentile, indicating a leading position in Saudi Arabia's Cafe & Restaurants industry. This means Meat moot outperforms 97% of its competitors, showing strong customer preference. Peers in the same percentile include: مطعم بحر عشرين - سي تونتي C20, حلوجي علي, Harraq Shawarma Abu Sayah, قهوة رستيكا | Qahwat Rastika, كبسات العريش, fool zaman.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception, driving loyalty and repeat business, essential for sustained growth and positive word-of-mouth.
Meat moot's overall CSAT is 84%, a 3.4 percentage point decrease year-over-year. The Eastern Province shows an 88% CSAT, down 5.1pp, while Tabuk Province has 75%, down 4.9pp. This indicates a need to address customer satisfaction issues, particularly in Tabuk Province, to improve customer retention and brand image.
Average check (transaction value) reflects spending habits and pricing strategy effectiveness, directly influencing revenue and profitability.
The overall average check for Meat moot is 200.20 SAR, a decrease of 8.80% year-over-year. The Eastern Province shows an average check of 206.90 SAR with 0% growth, while Tabuk Province has 184.40 SAR with 0% growth. This suggests a need to optimize pricing or encourage higher spending per visit, as the average transaction value has decreased.
Outlet count indicates market presence and growth potential, reflecting expansion strategy and accessibility to customers.
Meat moot has one outlet each in Tabuk Province and Eastern Province. Maintaining or increasing the number of outlets could expand market reach and customer accessibility.
Identifying key competitors through cross-visitation patterns helps refine marketing strategies and improve customer retention.
Meat moot's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (6), Al Romansiah (5), Shekhdar (5), Kudu (4), and Maestro Pizza (3). This indicates that customers who visit Meat moot also frequent these establishments. Strategies to differentiate and enhance customer loyalty are crucial.
Analyzing traffic workload by hour optimizes staffing, promotions, and resource allocation for peak efficiency and customer satisfaction.
Meat moot experiences peak traffic workload between 19:00 (7 PM) and 23:00 (11 PM), with the highest workload at 22:00 (10 PM). There is minimal traffic between 2:00 AM and 11:00 AM. Resource allocation and marketing efforts should focus on the evening peak hours.
Understanding consumer demographics allows targeted marketing campaigns and tailored service offerings, maximizing engagement and ROI.
Meat moot's customer base shows high affinity among women (92) and men (103). Gen X (264) show a high affinity, while Gen Y (73) are under-indexed. Marketing can leverage the Gen X affinity while strategies to engage Gen Y are needed.