Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
MAGiC TOUCH is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence MAGiC TOUCH performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
See what factors influence MAGiC TOUCH performance in the Taiwan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of MAGiC TOUCH' competitors in the Taiwan
An analysis of MAGiC TOUCH' competitors in the Taiwan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
MAGiC TOUCH is a leading brand in Taiwan's Cafe & Restaurants industry with a market performance percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1%. This indicates strong customer preference and competitive advantage. Performance peers in a similar range include THE·Spring, Yakiniku Smile Changhua Zhongshan Branch, 萬有食堂 萬有萬巒豬腳•萬有牛肉麵•竹山烤雞團餐熱炒推薦店•隱藏版美食•合菜推薦•快炒熱炒餐廳•團體餐廳•特色平價美食, 莆田, 佐藤咖哩 復興店, and 小兵砂鍋菜-老火雞湯.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception, influencing loyalty and advocacy, impacting long-term growth and profitability.
MAGiC TOUCH's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 78%, an increase of 8.4 percentage points year-over-year. Satisfaction varies by city: Kaohsiung (94%), Tainan (90%), Chiayi (83%), Hsinchu (65%) show positive trends, while Taipei (69%) has declined. Monitor Taipei's CSAT and leverage best practices from high-performing locations.
Average check reflects spending per customer, crucial for revenue insights and understanding customer value and pricing effectiveness.
The overall average check for MAGiC TOUCH is 491.2 TWD, a decrease of 0.6% year-over-year. Average check varies by city: Taipei (576.9 TWD), Kaohsiung (527.7 TWD), Tainan (523 TWD), Zhubei City (513 TWD), and Taoyuan City (454.2 TWD). Taipei has the highest average check.
Outlet count indicates brand reach, market presence, and expansion strategy, crucial for assessing growth potential and investment.
MAGiC TOUCH has varying numbers of outlets across cities: Tainan and Kaohsiung have 4 outlets each, followed by Taoyuan City and New Taipei with 3, Taipei and Taichung each have 2, while Yuanlin City, Chiayi, Hsinchu and Zhubei City each have 1 outlet. Most locations are in Tainan and Kaohsiung.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer overlap, informing strategies to enhance differentiation and retain market share.
The top competitors for MAGiC TOUCH, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (9.79%), Starbucks (5.69%), Sushiro (2.96%), Sushi Express (2.96%), and Kura Sushi (2.28%). McDonald's and Starbucks have a significant cross-visitation rate.
Traffic workload indicates peak hours and customer flow, crucial for staffing, inventory, and optimizing service during busy periods.
MAGiC TOUCH experiences peak traffic workload between 11:00 AM and 9:00 PM, with the highest traffic between 6:00 PM and 7:00 PM. Traffic is minimal between midnight and 10:00 AM.
Understanding consumer segments by gender and generation informs targeted marketing, enhancing relevance and maximizing campaign effectiveness.
MAGiC TOUCH has a high affinity with women(80%) and a low affinity with men (121%). Gen X(203%) and Gen Z(153%) segments show high affinity, while Gen Y (60%) shows under-indexed affinity towards the brand.