Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Löwengrube is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Löwengrube performance in the Italy and how they change over time
See what factors influence Löwengrube performance in the Italy and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Löwengrube' competitors in the Italy
An analysis of Löwengrube' competitors in the Italy
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Löwengrube, with a market performance of 99, is a leading brand, indicating a very strong market presence. It outperforms most competitors. Peers like Gelateria David, Sfoglia Rina, DeAmicis Uno, Caffè Gilli, Bar Pasticceria Mangiafico, and Otello share a similar high-performance bracket.
CSAT reflects customer happiness, impacting loyalty, word-of-mouth, and revenue. High CSAT indicates effective service and product quality.
Löwengrube's overall CSAT is 88%, a 5.9 percentage point increase year-over-year, signaling improved customer satisfaction. Abruzzo shows the highest satisfaction (100%), followed by Veneto (98%). There's a slight downturn in CSAT from April (90.87%) to June (79.25%) 2025.
Average check (revenue per transaction) indicates customer spending habits and pricing effectiveness. A higher average check boosts revenue.
Löwengrube's average check is 24.1 EUR, up 2.3% year-over-year, indicating customers are spending slightly more. Lombardy has the highest average check at 30.9 EUR. There's a dip in average check from April (25.08 EUR) to May (22.91 EUR) 2025, followed by a slight increase in June (23.78 EUR).
Outlet count signifies brand reach and market penetration. More outlets generally mean greater accessibility and brand visibility.
Löwengrube has a total of 24 outlets across Italy. Lombardy leads with 6 outlets, followed by Tuscany and Piedmont with 4 each. This distribution highlights key areas of operation.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences, guiding strategic positioning and competitive advantage efforts.
Löwengrube's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (5.47%), Autogrill (4.69%), Roadhouse Restaurant (2.73%), Old Wild West (1.56%), and Dispensa Emilia (1.56%). This shows customer overlap, pointing to direct competitors.
Traffic workload reveals peak hours, enabling optimized staffing and resource allocation for better service and efficiency.
Löwengrube experiences peak traffic between 7 PM and 10 PM, with 9 PM and 10 PM showing the highest workload (40.95% and 47.47% respectively). Traffic is minimal during morning hours, highlighting optimal times for resource deployment.
Understanding consumer segments allows tailored marketing, enhancing engagement and brand resonance with specific demographics.
Löwengrube's customer base shows affinity towards women (82) and men (114). Gen X (114) and Gen Y (111) are overrepresented, indicating high affinity, while Gen Z (41) is underrepresented. This suggests marketing should target older generations while seeking ways to engage younger consumers.