Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Gazebo is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Gazebo performance in the United Arab Emirates and how they change over time
See what factors influence Gazebo performance in the United Arab Emirates and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Gazebo' competitors in the United Arab Emirates
An analysis of Gazebo' competitors in the United Arab Emirates
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand strength and customer preference within the Cafe & Restaurants industry, showing competitive positioning.
Gazebo's market performance is in the top 1% percentile, indicating a leading position in the United Arab Emirates. This shows strong brand preference compared to competitors like Al Midan Al Shami Restaurant, Operation Falafel, Maxzi The Good Food Shop, Swiss Butter, Rosa's Thai - Dubai Hills, and Parker's, who are also in a similar high-performance bracket.
Customer satisfaction is key for loyalty, reflecting service quality and overall brand perception in the competitive restaurant sector.
Gazebo's overall customer satisfaction is 81%, a decrease of 4.1 percentage points year-over-year. Dubai and Ras al-Khaimah show high CSAT (84%), while Sharjah Emirate (76%) and Ajman Emirate (47%) require attention. CSAT decreased from 85.71% in April 2025 to 80.78% in June 2025.
Average check reflects spending per customer, showing pricing strategy effectiveness and customer willingness to spend at Gazebo.
The overall average check for Gazebo is AED 154.5, an increase of 11.9% year-over-year. Sharjah Emirate has the highest average check (AED 165.4), while Ajman Emirate has the lowest (AED 109.6). Average check decreased from AED 158.96 in April 2025 to AED 151.46 in June 2025.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence across different regions within the United Arab Emirates.
Gazebo has 19 outlets in Dubai, indicating a strong presence. Abu Dhabi Emirate has 9 outlets, Sharjah Emirate has 4, Ajman Emirate has 2, and Ras al-Khaimah has 1. This shows a concentrated presence in Dubai with opportunities for expansion in other Emirates.
Understanding competitors helps refine strategies, adapting to market dynamics and customer preferences by tracking cross-visitation rates.
Gazebo's top competitors based on cross-visitation are McDonald's (10.51%), KFC (7.24%), Starbucks (4.67%), Pizza Hut (3.97%), and Burger King (3.50%). These brands are frequently visited by Gazebo's customers, indicating shared customer preferences for fast food and casual dining.
Traffic workload by hours reveals peak times, which is essential for staffing, inventory, and marketing strategies.
Gazebo experiences peak traffic workload between 11 AM and 10 PM, with the highest traffic workload at 8 PM (63.80%) and 9 PM (62.70%). There is virtually no traffic between 1 AM and 9 AM. This data is crucial for optimizing resource allocation during peak hours.
Consumer segment analysis enables tailored marketing, maximizing engagement and resonating with specific demographics like gender and generation.
Women have a high affinity (75%) while men show over-indexed representation (114%). Gen X (140%) and Gen Y (101%) are over-indexed, while Gen Z (26%) is under-indexed. This suggests targeted marketing towards Gen X and Y could be effective.