Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Dhaba Beas is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Dhaba Beas performance in the Czechia and how they change over time
See what factors influence Dhaba Beas performance in the Czechia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Dhaba Beas' competitors in the Czechia
An analysis of Dhaba Beas' competitors in the Czechia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals the brand's share of foot traffic, reflecting competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Dhaba Beas holds a leading market position with a percentile of 99, placing it in the top 1% of brands. This indicates a strong competitive standing and high customer preference. Performance peers within this range include Gruzie Restaurant, Globus, Gastro Bar 1401 Praha, KYOTO FAST FOOD, Café Chloé and Lotus Restaurant - Grill & Sushi bar.
CSAT reflects brand perception. High CSAT indicates strong customer loyalty and positive brand reputation, driving repeat business and positive word-of-mouth referrals.
Dhaba Beas demonstrates strong customer satisfaction with an overall CSAT score of 81%, a 5.1 percentage point increase year-over-year. Moravia-Silesia shows the highest CSAT at 88%, despite a decrease. Southeast shows 82% and Prague 79% with an increase.
Average check reflects spending per customer. Tracking this KPI helps optimize pricing, promotions, and menu strategies to boost revenue and profitability.
The overall average check for Dhaba Beas is 213.1 CZK, a 5% decrease year-over-year. Southeast has the highest average check at 305.9 CZK. Prague average check is 201.9 CZK and Moravia-Silesia has 177.3 CZK.
Outlet count indicates market presence. Increasing outlet numbers can expand reach, cater to more customers, and strengthen brand recognition within the industry.
Dhaba Beas has a total of 19 outlets. Prague has the highest number of outlets at 13. Central Bohemia has 3 outlets. Southeast, Southwest and Moravia-Silesia each have 1 outlet.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals. Analyzing visitation overlap uncovers market dynamics and informs strategies to differentiate and gain market share.
The top competitors for Dhaba Beas based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's (7.78%), Burger King (3.33%), Bageterie Boulevard (3.33%), Starbucks (3.33%) and SKØG Urban Hub (3.33%).
Traffic workload patterns reveal peak hours. Understanding these patterns helps optimize staffing, resource allocation, and promotional efforts to enhance efficiency.
Traffic workload for Dhaba Beas peaks between 11 AM and 3 PM, with the highest traffic at 12 PM (65.57) and 1 PM (62.26). Minimal traffic occurs between 9 PM and 8 AM.
Understanding consumer segments allows for targeted marketing. Affinity insights inform effective messaging, promotional strategies, and product development efforts.
Dhaba Beas shows a high affinity with women (index 138) and Gen Z (index 118), indicating a strong representation in these segments. Gen X (index 114) shows positive representation, while Gen Y (index 85) is under-indexed.