Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence Torisho performance in the Japan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Torisho performance in the Japan and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Torisho' competitors in the Japan
An analysis of Torisho' competitors in the Japan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jul – Sep 25
Torisho is in the lower 34% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
Torisho's market performance is at the 34th percentile, indicating a below average market standing. This means Torisho captures less foot traffic compared to most competitors in Japan's Cafe & Restaurants industry. Performance peers in the same percentile range include: しゃぶしゃぶ すき焼き食べ放題 和牛と豚 近鉄奈良駅前店, Kemuriki Hikone Bellroad, Hakkakuan, Fūunji, Latte Graphic, and Qu'il fait bon.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer happiness, impacting loyalty, brand reputation, and revenue growth.
Torisho's overall CSAT is 85%, a 2.3 percentage point increase year-over-year, indicating improved customer happiness. Fukuoka Prefecture shows the highest CSAT at 100%, while Saitama Prefecture experienced a decrease. The CSAT trend increased from June to August 2025.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, crucial for pricing strategies and revenue optimization.
Torisho's overall average check is 1.3K JPY, a 5.4% increase year-over-year, suggesting customers are spending slightly more per visit. Osaka Prefecture's average check is 2K JPY. The average check fluctuated between June and August 2025.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence, influencing accessibility and brand awareness.
Torisho has the most outlets in Osaka Prefecture (11), followed by Kanagawa Prefecture (8). Other prefectures have fewer outlets, indicating varying levels of market penetration across Japan.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals, informing strategies to gain market share and customer loyalty.
Torisho's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are Sukiya (10.96%), 店 (9.59%), McDonald's (9.59%), Komeda's Coffee (8.22%), and Yoshinoya (8.22%). This indicates that Torisho's customers also frequently visit these brands.
Traffic workload analysis reveals peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation.
Torisho experiences peak traffic workload between 11:00 and 19:00, with the highest traffic around 18:00. Traffic is minimal during early morning hours.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, improving engagement and ROI.
Women (affinity index 105) are overrepresented among Torisho's consumers, while men (affinity index 96) are underrepresented. Gen Y (affinity index 144) shows a high affinity, while Gen Z (affinity index 89) is under-indexed.