Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Meat and Eat is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Meat and Eat performance in the India and how they change over time
See what factors influence Meat and Eat performance in the India and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Meat and Eat' competitors in the India
An analysis of Meat and Eat' competitors in the India
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance indicates brand's share of foot traffic, reflecting competitive strength and customer preference within its industry landscape.
Meat and Eat holds a leading market performance percentile of 99 in India's Cafe & Restaurants industry, placing it in the top 1% of brands. This indicates a very strong market position relative to its peers. Performance peers within the same percentile range include Mustard Madras, Bawarchi Restaurant, Karavalli, CoalSpark Restaurant, Karama Restaurant, and Mana Restaurant.
Customer satisfaction is a key performance indicator reflecting customer loyalty, impacting retention and positive recommendations to other consumers.
Meat and Eat's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) stands at 66%, with a 5.7 percentage point increase year-over-year. Tamil Nadu shows high CSAT at 67% with an 11.8 percentage point increase, while Karnataka shows 56% with a significant decrease of -19.8 percentage points. The CSAT trended between 59.31% and 71.77% during the observed months.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, showing trends in revenue per transaction and informing pricing or promotional strategies.
The overall average check for Meat and Eat is 555 INR, a 21.9% increase year-over-year. In Tamil Nadu, the average check is 551.7 INR, while in Karnataka, it is 394.7 INR. The average check fluctuated between 523.64 INR and 595.18 INR during the observed period.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and expansion, reflecting growth strategy and market penetration across geographic locations.
Meat and Eat has 98 outlets in Tamil Nadu, 37 in Karnataka, 5 in Assam, 4 in Nagaland, 3 in Sikkim, 3 in Andhra Pradesh, and 1 each in Kerala, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra and Telangana. Tamil Nadu has the most outlets, suggesting a concentration of brand presence there.
Competitor analysis identifies key players, revealing competitive landscape, market dynamics, and opportunities for differentiation and strategic positioning.
Meat and Eat's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are Juice Berry Restaurant (45.92%), Bistro 1427 Velachery (41.67%), Biggies Burger (37.07%), Sriram Bhojan (36.73%), and Jamai Biriyani - Chai Glass - Mid Night Biryani (32.99%). Juice Berry Restaurant is the most frequently visited competitor by Meat and Eat customers.
Traffic workload analysis pinpoints peak hours, helping optimize staffing, resource allocation, and marketing efforts to match customer demand.
Meat and Eat experiences peak traffic workload between 17:00 and 20:00, with the highest workload at 19:00 (63.72%). Traffic is lowest between 0:00 and 7:00, indicating the restaurant is busiest during the evening dinner hours.
Understanding consumer segments tailors marketing, improving engagement and conversion rates by aligning with preferences of distinct customer groups.
Meat and Eat's customer base consists of 54% women and 116% men (affinity indexes). Generationally, Gen X shows an affinity index of 85, Gen Y 95, and Gen Z 67. Men are overrepresented, while Gen X and Y show near-average representation, and Gen Z is underrepresented.