Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Kopenhagen performance in the Brazil and how they change over time
See what factors influence Kopenhagen performance in the Brazil and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Kopenhagen' competitors in the Brazil
An analysis of Kopenhagen' competitors in the Brazil
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Kopenhagen is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's foot traffic share, revealing competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Kopenhagen's MARKET PERFORMANCE in Brazil is in the top 1% of brands, indicating a leading position. This suggests strong customer preference and competitive advantage within the Cafe & Restaurants industry. Performance peers include Boteco Boa Praça, Sr. Kascudo, Yosugiru Sushi - Osasco, Restaurante Miguel e Meire, Casa Brasil Gastronomia e Arte and COMEDORIA DO CABEÇA, all within a similar performance range.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer happiness. High CSAT scores can increase loyalty, drive positive reviews, and boost overall brand perception.
Kopenhagen's overall CSAT in Brazil is 73%, a slight increase year-over-year. CSAT varies by region: Central-West Region shows the highest satisfaction (97%) with significant growth, while the South Region reports the lowest (67%) with decrease, indicating regional differences in customer experience.
Average check (BRL) is an important metric in the food industry. It indicates how much customers are spending per visit on average, which affect revenue.
Kopenhagen's overall average check in Brazil is 66.6 BRL, a 15% increase year-over-year. The Southeast Region shows an average check of 61.5 BRL. Central-West Region shows an average check of 51.7 BRL. Fluctuations in dynamic average check data show variability through months.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and presence. Analyzing outlet distribution by regions helps assess market coverage and expansion opportunities.
Kopenhagen has 164 outlets in Brazil. The Southeast Region has the most outlets (111), indicating a strong regional presence. The Central-West, South and Northeast Regions have 22, 21, and 8 outlets respectively, while the North Region has only 2 outlets.
Competitor analysis is crucial for strategic decision-making. Understanding which brands customers also visit helps identify competitive threats and opportunities.
The top competitors based on cross-visitation are NONNA (21.68%), Fábrica Doralice (16.08%), McDonald's (10.84%), Wine’s Territory (8.39%), and Mochileiros Casual Restaurant (6.64%). This data indicates customer preferences and overlaps in brand appeal within the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Traffic workload analysis helps optimize staffing and resource allocation during peak hours. Understanding customer traffic patterns ensures efficient service.
Kopenhagen's traffic workload peaks between 12 PM and 3 PM, reaching its highest point at 3 PM (57.14%). Traffic is minimal between midnight and 7 AM, suggesting an opportunity to optimize marketing around peak workload hours.
Analyzing consumer segments by gender and generation informs targeted marketing and positioning. These affinity insights enable more effective strategies.
Kopenhagen's customer base shows a slightly higher affinity towards women (111%) compared to men (90%). Among generations, Gen X shows high affinity (160%), while Gen Y (85%) and Gen Z (96%) are under-indexed, indicating different engagement levels across generations.