Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Katpėdėlė performance in the Lithuania and how they change over time
See what factors influence Katpėdėlė performance in the Lithuania and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Katpėdėlė' competitors in the Lithuania
An analysis of Katpėdėlė' competitors in the Lithuania
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Katpėdėlė is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows the brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Katpėdėlė is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99, indicating a strong market presence. This suggests high customer preference compared to competitors. Performance peers include Bernelių Užeiga, Sicilia, Dodo Pizza, Plus Plus Plus, Salsa duo-bistro, and CAFFEINE, also in the leading range.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty, directly impacting retention and revenue through positive experiences.
Katpėdėlė's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 60%, a 7.4 percentage point increase year-over-year. Vilnius County shows the highest CSAT at 64%, followed by Kaunas County (52%), Siauliai County (51%), and Klaipeda County (49%), all with positive growth. This suggests improving customer experiences across regions.
Average check reflects customer spending habits, essential for revenue forecasting and menu pricing optimization strategies.
Katpėdėlė's overall average check is 17.1 EUR, an 8.8% increase year-over-year. Klaipeda County has the highest average check at 18.3 EUR. Siauliai County follows with 17.8 EUR, then Vilnius County at 16.3 EUR and Telsiai County 16 EUR. This shows increased customer spending.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market coverage, influencing accessibility and potential customer base within regions.
Katpėdėlė has 6 outlets in Vilnius County, 2 in Klaipeda County, and 1 each in Telsiai, Siauliai, Panevezys and Kaunas Counties. The distribution indicates a strong presence in Vilnius, but limited presence in other counties. No growth values reported.
Competitor analysis helps refine strategies by identifying key rivals and understanding customer preferences in a competitive landscape.
Katpėdėlė's top competitors based on cross-visitation are Charlie Pizza (15.34%), Etno Dvaras (7.36%), Plus Plus Plus (4.60%), Grill London (4.29%), and Čili Pizza (3.99%). Charlie Pizza shows significantly higher cross-visitation, meaning there is a big crossover in customers.
Traffic workload analysis identifies peak hours, enabling staffing optimization and service adjustments for demand variations.
Katpėdėlė experiences peak traffic between 12:00 and 19:00, with the highest workload between 13:00 and 15:00. Traffic is lowest during the early morning hours (0:00 to 9:00). This shows when to optimize staffing.
Understanding consumer segments allows targeted marketing and product development based on demographic preferences and behaviors.
Katpėdėlė's customer base shows a high affinity index for women (106) and Gen Z (186), indicating they are overrepresented. Men are slightly underrepresented (95). Gen Y is underrepresented (78). Gen X shows near equal representation (104).