Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
See what factors influence iLunch performance in the Lithuania and how they change over time
See what factors influence iLunch performance in the Lithuania and how they change over time
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of iLunch' competitors in the Lithuania
An analysis of iLunch' competitors in the Lithuania
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
iLunch is in the lower 44% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
iLunch's market performance in Lithuania is at the 44th percentile, indicating a below average market position. This means iLunch captures less foot traffic than most competitors. Performance peers in the same percentile include Kavarsko koldūnai, Kinų bambukas, Restoranas Sodas, Dzūkynė, Čaina, and A Casa Mia.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer happiness, impacting loyalty and revenue. Tracking CSAT helps identify areas for improvement and maintain a competitive edge.
iLunch's overall CSAT is 53%, a decrease of 12.4 percentage points year-over-year. Klaipeda County shows a higher CSAT (71%) than Vilnius County (51%), but both regions experienced a decrease. The CSAT trend shows fluctuations between May and July 2025.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and market presence. Tracking outlet distribution helps assess market coverage and expansion opportunities.
iLunch has 25 outlets in Vilnius County, 4 in Kaunas County, and 1 each in Klaipeda and Siauliai Counties. Vilnius County accounts for the majority of iLunch's outlets, indicating a strong presence in that region.
Identifying key competitors helps understand the competitive landscape and benchmark performance. Cross-visitation data reveals shared customer base and competitive overlap.
iLunch's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are McDonald's and CAFFEINE (both 12.12%), followed by Etno Dvaras and Jammi (both 9.09%), and Grill London (6.06%). This indicates a significant overlap in customer base with these brands.
Traffic workload by hour reveals peak and off-peak times, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation to optimize customer service and operational efficiency.
iLunch experiences peak traffic workload between 11:00 and 13:00, with the highest workload at 12:00 (64.71). There is no traffic workload between 0:00 and 10:00, and from 15:00 to 23:00.
Understanding consumer segments by gender and generation enables targeted marketing and product development, improving engagement and brand affinity.
iLunch's customer base shows a high affinity for women (index 93) and men (index 105). Among generations, Gen Z is significantly overrepresented (index 305), while Gen X (index 66) and Gen Y (index 79) are underrepresented.