Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Golden Lamian performance in the Indonesia and how they change over time
See what factors influence Golden Lamian performance in the Indonesia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Golden Lamian' competitors in the Indonesia
An analysis of Golden Lamian' competitors in the Indonesia
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafés & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Golden Lamian is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals a brand's competitive strength and customer preference, reflecting its share of foot traffic in the industry.
Golden Lamian holds a leading position in Indonesia's Cafe & Restaurants industry with a market performance percentile of 99, indicating it captures a significant share of customer traffic. Performance peers within the same percentile range include Nasi Mandhi Bosgil Condet, Wizzmie Ahmad Yani Bandung, Mie Gacoan Jakarta - Lenteng Agung, TOM SUSHI MAL SKA, Gacoan Sutomo, and J.CO Donuts & Coffee, showcasing strong competition.
Customer satisfaction is crucial for brand loyalty and growth, reflecting the quality of service and products provided to customers.
Golden Lamian exhibits strong customer satisfaction in Indonesia, with an overall CSAT of 90%, up 19.6 percentage points year-over-year. Sumatra leads with 99%, Java at 90%, and Lesser Sunda Islands at 78%, showing regional variations. The upward trend in CSAT indicates improved customer experiences over the past year.
Average check reflects customer spending per visit, indicating pricing strategy effectiveness and customer purchasing behavior.
Golden Lamian's average check in Indonesia is 33.5K IDR, a decrease of 52.3% year-over-year. Java has an average check of 33.4K IDR, while Sumatra's average check is 28.2K IDR. The significant decrease requires investigation to understand factors influencing spending habits.
Outlet count signifies brand reach and accessibility, influencing market penetration and customer convenience.
Golden Lamian has a total of 52 outlets in Indonesia. Java accounts for 45 outlets, Sumatra has 5 outlets, and Lesser Sunda Islands has 2 outlets. The concentration of outlets in Java suggests a strategic focus on this region for market presence.
Analyzing competitors helps understand market dynamics and identify opportunities to differentiate and gain market share.
The top competitors of Golden Lamian, based on customer cross-visitation, are Golden Lamian - Puri Indah Mall (7.66%), Golden Lamian | Aeon delta mas (5.41%), Golden Lamian Cideng (4.95%), Golden Lamian Stasiun MRT Blok M (4.50%), and Golden Lamian - Grand Indonesia (4.50%).
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation, ensuring efficient service during peak hours.
Golden Lamian experiences peak traffic workload between 10:00 AM and 9:00 PM, with the highest activity around 6:00 PM (57.67%) and 7:00 PM (57.53%). Minimal traffic occurs between midnight and 9:00 AM, indicating operational hours primarily cater to lunch and dinner crowds.
Understanding consumer segments enables tailored marketing and product strategies, maximizing engagement and brand relevance.
Golden Lamian's consumer base shows an affinity index of 95 for women and 104 for men. Gen X has an affinity index of 55, while Gen Y shows 109, and Gen Z shows 110. Gen Y and Gen Z are highly engaged, while Gen X shows less engagement.