Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Bucking Bull is in the top 6% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Bucking Bull performance in the Australia and how they change over time
See what factors influence Bucking Bull performance in the Australia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Bucking Bull' competitors in the Australia
An analysis of Bucking Bull' competitors in the Australia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
Cafés & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Bucking Bull is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 94 in Australia's Cafe & Restaurants industry. This indicates a leading market position, surpassing most competitors. Peers such as Edwardes Lake Hotel, Madame Yen, Woodbridge Hotel, Workshop Brothers Southbank, Seaway Kiosk, and Madeleine are in a similar range.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception, driving loyalty and repeat business. Tracking CSAT pinpoints areas for service and product improvement.
Bucking Bull's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 52%, a significant increase of 18.5 percentage points year-over-year. Queensland shows high satisfaction at 71%, while Western Australia has a CSAT of 47% with notable growth. CSAT varied slightly over the period, peaking in May 2025.
Average check reveals customer spending habits, impacting revenue. Monitoring this KPI helps optimize pricing and identify upselling opportunities.
Bucking Bull's overall average check is 19.5 AUD, a 5.1% increase year-over-year, showing that customers are spending more per visit. In Western Australia, the average check is 20.8 AUD. The average check remained relatively stable during the period from May to July 2025.
Outlet count signifies market reach and growth. Tracking outlet distribution informs expansion strategies and identifies geographic strengths.
Bucking Bull has 11 outlets in Western Australia and 4 in Queensland. Western Australia represents a larger market presence for Bucking Bull compared to Queensland, highlighting regional focus.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer preferences. This insight informs competitive strategies and pinpoints differentiation opportunities.
Bucking Bull's top competitors, based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (15.79%), KFC (15.79%), Hungry Jack's Burgers (10.53%), and Pizza Hut (10.53%). Thabeban Take Away shows a lower cross-visitation rate of 5.26%. This shows which brands are frequently visited by Bucking Bull's customer base.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing and resource allocation. Understanding peak hours ensures efficient operations and minimizes customer wait times.
Bucking Bull's traffic workload peaks between 11 AM and 1 PM, reaching a high of 63.57 at 12 PM. Traffic is minimal in the early morning and evening hours. Staffing and resource allocation should be optimized to accommodate peak demand during lunchtime.
Understanding consumer segments ensures targeted marketing. Gender and generation insights refine messaging, increasing relevance and campaign effectiveness.
Bucking Bull's customer base shows high affinity among women and Gen Z. Women are over-represented (affinity index of 140), while men are under-represented (affinity index of 68). Both Gen X and Gen Z are over-represented, with Gen Z showing the highest affinity (336).